Variations in the Management of Low-Grade Serous Carcinoma of the Ovary: A Global Survey

Abstract Objective Low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSOC) constituting < 15% of ovarian or peritoneal serous carcinomas differs distinctly from high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC). This global survey investigates the variations in managing LGSOC, acknowledging its unique characteristics and the absence of a consensus on optimal management. Methods A voluntary non-incentivized global survey gathered responses from 203 practitioners across 50 countries and 7 continents. Approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee, it encompassed 21 questions focusing on demographics, diagnosis, and management practices. Descriptive statistics and Fisher’s exact test analyzed the data. Results Demographically diverse responses were obtained with the majority from India (39.9%) and Colombia (5.4%). Gynecologic oncologists predominated (73.10%), with varied practice settings. Most practitioners considered LGSOC distinct (95.57%). Diagnosis criteria showed institutional variations. In managing apparent inoperable stage III C LGSOC approaches varied: neoadjuvant chemotherapy (54.78%), upfront surgery (35.69%), and neoadjuvant hormone therapy (8.54%). Adjuvant management demonstrated heterogeneity. Notably, there was no significant association between the continent and the offered adjuvant treatment for optimally cytoreduced stage III C LGSOC ( p = 0.556; Fisher’s exact test). For recurrent disease, hormonal therapy (30.54%) and chemotherapy (27.59%) were common choices. MEK inhibitors were infrequently used. Fertility preservation was favored (71%), and HIPEC was not widely considered (81.28%). Genetic testing opinions varied: routine testing (28.7%), no recommendation (45.32%), and testing in recurrent settings (16.75%). Conclusion This survey exposes global disparities in LGSOC management, highlighting the need for standardized guidelines to address challenges in diagnosis and management. International collaboration is advocated to enhance uniformity in healthcare practices for LGSOC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40944-024-00944-4
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variations in the Management of Low-Grade Serous Carcinoma of the Ovary: A Global Survey

Akshay Patil, Biswajit Dash, Geetu Bhandoria, Amita Maheshwari et al.
Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
article

Variations in the Management of Low-Grade Serous Carcinoma of the Ovary: A Global Survey

Akshay Patil, Biswajit Dash, Geetu Bhandoria, Amita Maheshwari, Seema Gulia
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective Low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSOC) constituting < 15% of ovarian or peritoneal serous carcinomas differs distinctly from high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC). This global survey investigates the variations in managing LGSOC, acknowledging its unique characteristics and the absence of a consensus on optimal management. Methods A voluntary non-incentivized global survey gathered responses from 203 practitioners across 50 countries and 7 continents. Approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee, it encompassed 21 questions focusing on demographics, diagnosis, and management practices. Descriptive statistics and Fisher’s exact test analyzed the data. Results Demographically diverse responses were obtained with the majority from India (39.9%) and Colombia (5.4%). Gynecologic oncologists predominated (73.10%), with varied practice settings. Most practitioners considered LGSOC distinct (95.57%). Diagnosis criteria showed institutional variations. In managing apparent inoperable stage III C LGSOC approaches varied: neoadjuvant chemotherapy (54.78%), upfront surgery (35.69%), and neoadjuvant hormone therapy (8.54%). Adjuvant management demonstrated heterogeneity. Notably, there was no significant association between the continent and the offered adjuvant treatment for optimally cytoreduced stage III C LGSOC ( p = 0.556; Fisher’s exact test). For recurrent disease, hormonal therapy (30.54%) and chemotherapy (27.59%) were common choices. MEK inhibitors were infrequently used. Fertility preservation was favored (71%), and HIPEC was not widely considered (81.28%). Genetic testing opinions varied: routine testing (28.7%), no recommendation (45.32%), and testing in recurrent settings (16.75%). Conclusion This survey exposes global disparities in LGSOC management, highlighting the need for standardized guidelines to address challenges in diagnosis and management. International collaboration is advocated to enhance uniformity in healthcare practices for LGSOC.

Indian Journal of Gynecologic OncologyVol. 23(1)
Homi Bhabha National Institute (IN), Royal Derby Hospital (GB), Eastern Command Hospital (IN), University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Command Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.