Unpacking power dynamics and women's economic empowerment in polygynous households in Burkina Faso

Abstract Objective We aim to describe power distributions in polygynous households and consider how these matter for the production and allocation of food‐generating resources in western Burkina Faso, where there is a high prevalence of polygyny. Background Recent studies on polygyny focus on its likely negative consequences and mechanisms for explaining these outcomes using data from large multitopic surveys. These approaches fail to consider the underlying dynamics in polygynous households. Method As part of a 5‐year mixed‐methods evaluation of a nutrition‐ and gender‐sensitive poultry value chain intervention in western Burkina Faso, we conducted a thematic analysis of 24 gender‐disaggregated focus group discussions (265 individuals) and 24 semi‐structured interviews in six communities. They focused on gender and power dynamics, food production, and food allocation with a specific focus on polygyny. Results Relationships among co‐wives are often cooperative, though not necessarily warm, and typically hierarchical. Monogamous and polygynous marriage may support women's empowerment in different domains. Polygynous co‐wives may be able to divide care work, but first wives often control how labor is divided. In monogamous marriages, wives often make decisions jointly with their husbands, while in polygynous marriages, most co‐wives are left out of decisions. In polygynous households, women are better able to maintain control over their earnings. Conclusion We discuss these findings in terms of their implications for studying polygynous households in quantitative surveys and in terms of how to better design and target interventions for this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marriage and the Family
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.13063
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Social Policies and Family
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unpacking power dynamics and women's economic empowerment in polygynous households in Burkina Faso

Sarah Eissler, Rasmané Ganaba, Armande Sanou, Aulo Gelli et al.
3 citations
Journal of Marriage and the Family
Social Policies and Family
3.40
article

Unpacking power dynamics and women's economic empowerment in polygynous households in Burkina Faso

Sarah Eissler, Rasmané Ganaba, Armande Sanou, Aulo Gelli, Abdoulaye Pedehombga, Jessica Heckert
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objective We aim to describe power distributions in polygynous households and consider how these matter for the production and allocation of food‐generating resources in western Burkina Faso, where there is a high prevalence of polygyny. Background Recent studies on polygyny focus on its likely negative consequences and mechanisms for explaining these outcomes using data from large multitopic surveys. These approaches fail to consider the underlying dynamics in polygynous households. Method As part of a 5‐year mixed‐methods evaluation of a nutrition‐ and gender‐sensitive poultry value chain intervention in western Burkina Faso, we conducted a thematic analysis of 24 gender‐disaggregated focus group discussions (265 individuals) and 24 semi‐structured interviews in six communities. They focused on gender and power dynamics, food production, and food allocation with a specific focus on polygyny. Results Relationships among co‐wives are often cooperative, though not necessarily warm, and typically hierarchical. Monogamous and polygynous marriage may support women's empowerment in different domains. Polygynous co‐wives may be able to divide care work, but first wives often control how labor is divided. In monogamous marriages, wives often make decisions jointly with their husbands, while in polygynous marriages, most co‐wives are left out of decisions. In polygynous households, women are better able to maintain control over their earnings. Conclusion We discuss these findings in terms of their implications for studying polygynous households in quantitative surveys and in terms of how to better design and target interventions for this population.

Journal of Marriage and the FamilyVol. 87(3)
International Food Policy Research Institute (US), West Chester University (US), AFRICSanté (BF)
United States Agency for International Development, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Social Policies and Family
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.