Examining New Public Diplomacy and Interfaith Dialogue in Indonesia: Cases of World Peace Forum (WPF) and Religion Twenty (R20)

This paper delves into the relationship between new public diplomacy and interfaith dialogue in Indonesia by explicating the cases of the World Peace Forum and Religion Twenty. Using qualitative methods, the article holistically explores the emergence, goals, actors, and dynamics of both religious organizations’ diplomacy. This study demonstrates that both forums aim to promote world peace by introducing “Moderate Islam” as the face of Indonesian diplomacy. The findings in this paper also show several strengths and weaknesses of the two forums. This paper analyses the topic from a broader perspective by using the new public diplomacy theory and theory of change from the perspective of interfaith dialogue. Hence, this paper concentrates on enriching the academic understanding of interfaith diplomacy as a reference in the development of interfaith diplomacy in other countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
STUDIA ISLAMIKA
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36712/sdi.v31i3.38376
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining New Public Diplomacy and Interfaith Dialogue in Indonesia: Cases of World Peace Forum (WPF) and Religion Twenty (R20)

Tri Sulistianing Astuti, Djayadi Hanan, Ridwan Ridwan
4 citations
STUDIA ISLAMIKA
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
4.53
article

Examining New Public Diplomacy and Interfaith Dialogue in Indonesia: Cases of World Peace Forum (WPF) and Religion Twenty (R20)

Tri Sulistianing Astuti, Djayadi Hanan, Ridwan Ridwan
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This paper delves into the relationship between new public diplomacy and interfaith dialogue in Indonesia by explicating the cases of the World Peace Forum and Religion Twenty. Using qualitative methods, the article holistically explores the emergence, goals, actors, and dynamics of both religious organizations’ diplomacy. This study demonstrates that both forums aim to promote world peace by introducing “Moderate Islam” as the face of Indonesian diplomacy. The findings in this paper also show several strengths and weaknesses of the two forums. This paper analyses the topic from a broader perspective by using the new public diplomacy theory and theory of change from the perspective of interfaith dialogue. Hence, this paper concentrates on enriching the academic understanding of interfaith diplomacy as a reference in the development of interfaith diplomacy in other countries.

STUDIA ISLAMIKAVol. 31(3)
Universitas Internasional Semen Indonesia (ID), Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
4.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Examining New Public Diplomacy and Interfaith Dialogue in Indonesia: Cases of World Peace Forum (WPF) and Religion Twenty (R20) — Tri Sulistianing Astuti, Djayadi Hanan, et al. · STUDIA ISLAMIKA (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS