Sustainability Assessment of Fly Ash, Lime Sludge, and Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag–Based Geopolymer-Stabilized Kaolin Clay

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sustainability benefits of Class F fly ash (FA), lime sludge (LS), and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS)-based geopolymer-stabilized Edgar plastic kaolin (EPK) clay using the sustainability index (ISus) approach. Geotechnical engineering operations usually precede most infrastructural projects, making pavement construction an integral contributor to various environmental effects, due to the production of enormous quantities of greenhouse gas emissions through soil stabilization activities. To nip these concerns in the bud, effective integration of these environmental implications must be achieved during the geotechnical planning phase. The life cycle assessment (LCA) method was used to assess a wide range of environmental effects of a project, from raw material procurement, manufacturing, transportation, construction, and maintenance to final disposal. It is a well-recognized tool for designing environmentally sustainable projects. Experimental results from the geopolymer-stabilized EPK clay showed a notable improvement in unconfined compressive strength of the geopolymer-stabilized clay with 15% (FA + LS) and 5% (FA + GGBS) contents of up to 697% and 464%, respectively, after 28 days of curing at elevated temperature, 70°C. The sustainability index (ISus) of geopolymer and lime treatment methods was analyzed based on the concept of environmental, resource consumption, and socioeconomic concerns, which quantifies the sustainability through greenhouse gas emission, environmental impacts, and the cost of utilizing FA, LS, and GGBS in soil stabilization compared with traditional lime. LCA was conducted for traditional lime treatment, FA-LS, and FA-GGBS geopolymer-stabilized subgrades to determine the most sustainable treatment method. From the sustainability analysis, using FA, LS, and GGBS as geopolymer stabilizers for kaolin clay reduced the global warming potential by 98.03% and 77.55% over the traditional lime stabilizers at 8% dosage. More importantly, results from the sustainability index (ISus) computations showed that FA-LS (ISus = 12.88) and FA-GGBS (ISus = 29.72) geopolymer treatment methods of EPK clay subgrade soils are more sustainable alternatives compared to the traditional lime (ISus = 48.07) treatment method.