Compressed carbon dioxide energy storage in salt caverns holds promise for China's hard-to-abate sectors

<p>Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) is an effective technology for grid-scale peak shaving, while Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage (CCUS) plays a crucial role in carbon reduction. As China strives to peaking carbon emissions by 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by <styled-content style-type="number">2060</styled-content> faces significant challenges, especially for the hard-to-abate sectors pose significant challenges. Building on the principles of CAES and CCUS, this paper introduces a novel approach: Compressed Carbon Energy Storage (CCES), , which integrates CAES and CCUS. CCES uses salt caverns to store compressed supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> instead of air. This study explores the feasibility of CCES in salt caverns, addressing stability, tightness, containment, site selection, and capacity potential in China. Key findings include: 1) CCES, an advanced version of CAES, offers doubles the installed capacity compared to traditional CAES by combining the benefits of both CAES and CCUS benefits. 2) CCES salt caverns in typical bedded salt formations can maintain stability and integrity for 100 years. 3) Optimal cavern depths for supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> storage range 800-<styled-content style-type="number">1500</styled-content> m, with a minimum cavern volume of 25 × 10<sup>4</sup> m<sup>3</sup> for a capacity of at least 300 MW. 4) CO<sub>2</sub> storage in salt caverns offers better tightness compared to air, methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), and hydrogen (H<sub>2</sub>), with an interlayer permeability threshold of ≤ 1.0 × 10<sup>–18</sup> m<sup>2</sup> for adequate tightness. 5) Potential CCES sites in China have been identified, with preliminary estimates suggesting a total capacity of 46.62-69.93 GW and theoretical capacity of up to 280 million tons of CO<sub>2</sub> for China’s hard-to-abate sectors.</p>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Innovation Energy
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-energy.2024.100065
Citations
7
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Compressed carbon dioxide energy storage in salt caverns holds promise for China's hard-to-abate sectors

Xiang‐Zhao Kong, Jifang Wan, Liangliang Jiang, Kai Wen et al.
7 citations
The Innovation Energy
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
1.44
article

Compressed carbon dioxide energy storage in salt caverns holds promise for China's hard-to-abate sectors

Xiang‐Zhao Kong, Jifang Wan, Liangliang Jiang, Kai Wen, Nanlin Zhang, Wei Liu, Yiwen Ju, Xingyu Duan, Aliakbar Hassanpouryouzban
article en
7 citations

Abstract

<p>Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) is an effective technology for grid-scale peak shaving, while Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage (CCUS) plays a crucial role in carbon reduction. As China strives to peaking carbon emissions by 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by <styled-content style-type="number">2060</styled-content> faces significant challenges, especially for the hard-to-abate sectors pose significant challenges. Building on the principles of CAES and CCUS, this paper introduces a novel approach: Compressed Carbon Energy Storage (CCES), , which integrates CAES and CCUS. CCES uses salt caverns to store compressed supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> instead of air. This study explores the feasibility of CCES in salt caverns, addressing stability, tightness, containment, site selection, and capacity potential in China. Key findings include: 1) CCES, an advanced version of CAES, offers doubles the installed capacity compared to traditional CAES by combining the benefits of both CAES and CCUS benefits. 2) CCES salt caverns in typical bedded salt formations can maintain stability and integrity for 100 years. 3) Optimal cavern depths for supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> storage range 800-<styled-content style-type="number">1500</styled-content> m, with a minimum cavern volume of 25 × 10<sup>4</sup> m<sup>3</sup> for a capacity of at least 300 MW. 4) CO<sub>2</sub> storage in salt caverns offers better tightness compared to air, methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), and hydrogen (H<sub>2</sub>), with an interlayer permeability threshold of ≤ 1.0 × 10<sup>–18</sup> m<sup>2</sup> for adequate tightness. 5) Potential CCES sites in China have been identified, with preliminary estimates suggesting a total capacity of 46.62-69.93 GW and theoretical capacity of up to 280 million tons of CO<sub>2</sub> for China’s hard-to-abate sectors.</p>

The Innovation EnergyVol. 2(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
1.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.