Comparison of Predictive Performance Between Simple Models and Computational Analysis for High-Pressure Hydrogen Tank Explosion Characteristics

In this study, the overpressure and impulse distribution characteristics of high-pressure hydrogen tank explosions were analyzed using simplified models and computational analysis. Two simplified models, Molkov’s model and the TNT-equivalent method, were employed, and a computational analysis was conducted using the OpenFOAM code with the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes approach. The pressure wave propagated spherically during the explosion of the high-pressure hydrogen tank. However, the interaction with the ground generated a reflected overpressure, which had a significant influence on the radial overpressure distribution. Furthermore, the high-temperature flame region was confined to the vicinity of the explosion source, and the flame was identified as a diffusion flame. The simplified models predicted the maximum overpressures in the radial and axial directions. As the simplified models treat the hydrogen tank as a point source, they predict the same overpressure and impulse values in both the radial and axial directions, which can limit the accuracy of real high-pressure hydrogen tanks with large aspect ratios (length-to-diameter ratios). Computational fluid dynamics analysis showed reasonable agreement for the maximum overpressure of the experimental results in both the radial and axial directions. However, the accurate modeling of the reflected overpressure, particularly at close distances, is critical to improving the prediction accuracy for overpressure and impulse distributions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Fire Science and Engineering
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7731/kifse.d26b7183
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Combustion and Detonation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Predictive Performance Between Simple Models and Computational Analysis for High-Pressure Hydrogen Tank Explosion Characteristics

Dinesh Myilsamy, Chang Bo Oh
1 citations
Fire Science and Engineering
Combustion and Detonation Processes
1.30
article

Comparison of Predictive Performance Between Simple Models and Computational Analysis for High-Pressure Hydrogen Tank Explosion Characteristics

Dinesh Myilsamy, Chang Bo Oh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this study, the overpressure and impulse distribution characteristics of high-pressure hydrogen tank explosions were analyzed using simplified models and computational analysis. Two simplified models, Molkov’s model and the TNT-equivalent method, were employed, and a computational analysis was conducted using the OpenFOAM code with the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes approach. The pressure wave propagated spherically during the explosion of the high-pressure hydrogen tank. However, the interaction with the ground generated a reflected overpressure, which had a significant influence on the radial overpressure distribution. Furthermore, the high-temperature flame region was confined to the vicinity of the explosion source, and the flame was identified as a diffusion flame. The simplified models predicted the maximum overpressures in the radial and axial directions. As the simplified models treat the hydrogen tank as a point source, they predict the same overpressure and impulse values in both the radial and axial directions, which can limit the accuracy of real high-pressure hydrogen tanks with large aspect ratios (length-to-diameter ratios). Computational fluid dynamics analysis showed reasonable agreement for the maximum overpressure of the experimental results in both the radial and axial directions. However, the accurate modeling of the reflected overpressure, particularly at close distances, is critical to improving the prediction accuracy for overpressure and impulse distributions.

Fire Science and EngineeringVol. 38(6)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Combustion and Detonation Processes
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.