Assessing how accurately large language models encode and apply the common European framework of reference for languages

Large Language Models (LLMs) can have a transformative effect on a variety of domains, including education, and it is therefore pressing to understand whether these models have knowledge of – or, in other words, how they have encoded – the specific pedagogical requirements of different educational domains, and whether they use this when performing educational tasks. In this work, we propose an approach to evaluate the knowledge – or encoding – that the LLMs have of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR), and use it to evaluate five modern LLMs. Our study shows that the suite of tasks we propose is quite challenging for all the LLMs, and they often provide results which are not satisfactory and would be unusable in educational applications, suggesting that – even if they encode some information about the CEFR – this knowledge is not really leveraged when performing downstream tasks.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100353
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing how accurately large language models encode and apply the common European framework of reference for languages

Paula Buttery, Andrew Caines, Luca Benedetto, Gabrielle Gaudeau
8 citations
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Natural Language Processing Techniques
2.78
article

Assessing how accurately large language models encode and apply the common European framework of reference for languages

Paula Buttery, Andrew Caines, Luca Benedetto, Gabrielle Gaudeau
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) can have a transformative effect on a variety of domains, including education, and it is therefore pressing to understand whether these models have knowledge of – or, in other words, how they have encoded – the specific pedagogical requirements of different educational domains, and whether they use this when performing educational tasks. In this work, we propose an approach to evaluate the knowledge – or encoding – that the LLMs have of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR), and use it to evaluate five modern LLMs. Our study shows that the suite of tasks we propose is quite challenging for all the LLMs, and they often provide results which are not satisfactory and would be unusable in educational applications, suggesting that – even if they encode some information about the CEFR – this knowledge is not really leveraged when performing downstream tasks.

Computers and Education Artificial IntelligenceVol. 8
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing how accurately large language models encode and apply the common European framework of reference for languages — Paula Buttery, Andrew Caines, et al. · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS