Mercedes-Decision of the European Court of Justice: A New Phase in European Law

The European Court of Justice's 2023 ruling in the Mercedes case has upheld an individual compensation claim even without explicit legislative provisions for such compensation. This landmark decision has reignited the longstanding debate in Europe regarding the interplay between public policy regulation and national private law. This paper analyses the case, delves into the historical and political debates underpinning it, and explores its implications for positive law. It offers three key contributions to the ongoing discourse: First, the ECJ's ruling establishes a new pathway for individual claims based on breaches of European law, prompting Member States to implement appropriate remedial measures. Second, the decision elevates a nearly century-old debate on balancing public interest regulation and individual protection to new heights. Third, the ruling has already begun to shape the European and German legal landscapes, provoking similar discussions in Turkish law, particularly in unfair competition law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Türk-Alman Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59933/tauhfd.1610500
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mercedes-Decision of the European Court of Justice: A New Phase in European Law

Cihat Börklüce
1 links
Türk-Alman Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi
European and International Law Studies
article

Mercedes-Decision of the European Court of Justice: A New Phase in European Law

Cihat Börklüce
article en

Abstract

The European Court of Justice's 2023 ruling in the Mercedes case has upheld an individual compensation claim even without explicit legislative provisions for such compensation. This landmark decision has reignited the longstanding debate in Europe regarding the interplay between public policy regulation and national private law. This paper analyses the case, delves into the historical and political debates underpinning it, and explores its implications for positive law. It offers three key contributions to the ongoing discourse: First, the ECJ's ruling establishes a new pathway for individual claims based on breaches of European law, prompting Member States to implement appropriate remedial measures. Second, the decision elevates a nearly century-old debate on balancing public interest regulation and individual protection to new heights. Third, the ruling has already begun to shape the European and German legal landscapes, provoking similar discussions in Turkish law, particularly in unfair competition law.

Türk-Alman Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi DergisiVol. 6(2)
Türkisch-Deutsche Universität (TR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.