The diagnostic performance of non-invasive fibrosis markers for predicting fibrosis in primary biliary cholangitis patients

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between liver fibrosis measured by transient elastography and non-invasive fibrosis scoring systems, including Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) and aspartate-aminotransferase (AST)-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Material and Methods: A total of 45 PBC patients followed in the Gastroenterology Clinic were included in this retrospective study. Transient elastography was performed on all participants, and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) values were recorded in kilopascals (kPa). Fibrosis was defined as LSM ≥ 6.3 kPa, while advanced fibrosis was defined as LSM ≥ 10.5 kPa. To calculate the APRI score, the formula [(AST / upper normal limit × 100) / platelet count] was used, and for the FIB-4 score, the formula [(age × AST) / (platelet count × √alanine aminotransferase)] was applied. Results: Liver fibrosis was identified in 71.1% (n = 32) of patients, with advanced fibrosis present in 40.0% (n = 18). Patients with fibrosis had higher APRI and FIB-4 scores compared to those without fibrosis. Also, the median APRI score (0.7 vs. 0.5, p < 0.001) and median FIB-4 score (2.4 vs. 1.6, p < 0.001) were higher in patients with advanced liver fibrosis than in those without. For detecting fibrosis, the AUROC values were 0.73 (95% CI: 0.58–0.89) for APRI and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.73–0.96) for FIB-4. FIB-4 also showed higher accuracy than APRI for identifying advanced fibrosis (AUROC: 0.78 vs. 0.70, p = 0.042). Conclusion: Both APRI and FIB-4 are useful non-invasive tools for detecting and staging fibrosis in PBC. However, FIB-4 demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to APRI, particularly in predicting advanced fibrosis. Incorporating these markers into routine clinical practice may reduce the need for invasive liver biopsy and help optimize patient management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18663/tjcl.1594235
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The diagnostic performance of non-invasive fibrosis markers for predicting fibrosis in primary biliary cholangitis patients

Nermin Mutlu Bilgiç, Gupse Adalı
Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
article

The diagnostic performance of non-invasive fibrosis markers for predicting fibrosis in primary biliary cholangitis patients

Nermin Mutlu Bilgiç, Gupse Adalı
article en

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between liver fibrosis measured by transient elastography and non-invasive fibrosis scoring systems, including Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) and aspartate-aminotransferase (AST)-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Material and Methods: A total of 45 PBC patients followed in the Gastroenterology Clinic were included in this retrospective study. Transient elastography was performed on all participants, and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) values were recorded in kilopascals (kPa). Fibrosis was defined as LSM ≥ 6.3 kPa, while advanced fibrosis was defined as LSM ≥ 10.5 kPa. To calculate the APRI score, the formula [(AST / upper normal limit × 100) / platelet count] was used, and for the FIB-4 score, the formula [(age × AST) / (platelet count × √alanine aminotransferase)] was applied. Results: Liver fibrosis was identified in 71.1% (n = 32) of patients, with advanced fibrosis present in 40.0% (n = 18). Patients with fibrosis had higher APRI and FIB-4 scores compared to those without fibrosis. Also, the median APRI score (0.7 vs. 0.5, p < 0.001) and median FIB-4 score (2.4 vs. 1.6, p < 0.001) were higher in patients with advanced liver fibrosis than in those without. For detecting fibrosis, the AUROC values were 0.73 (95% CI: 0.58–0.89) for APRI and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.73–0.96) for FIB-4. FIB-4 also showed higher accuracy than APRI for identifying advanced fibrosis (AUROC: 0.78 vs. 0.70, p = 0.042). Conclusion: Both APRI and FIB-4 are useful non-invasive tools for detecting and staging fibrosis in PBC. However, FIB-4 demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to APRI, particularly in predicting advanced fibrosis. Incorporating these markers into routine clinical practice may reduce the need for invasive liver biopsy and help optimize patient management.

Turkish Journal of Clinics and LaboratoryVol. 15(4)
University of Health Science (KH), Ümraniye Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.