Psychometric validation of type 2 Diabetes Distress Assessment System in an Indian type 2 diabetes population

Diabetes distress (DD) significantly burdens and negatively impacts self-management and health outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Early detection and management of DD are crucial for effective T2D management. The Diabetes Distress Assessment System (T2-DDAS) is a recently validated tool for measuring DD, but its psychometric properties in non-Western populations, such as India, have not been evaluated. This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of T2-DDAS in Indian patients with T2D. Data from 408 T2D patients enrolled in a one-year diabetes management program at the Freedom from Diabetes Clinic in Pune, India, from January to March 2024, were analyzed. Sociodemographic characteristics, medical history, and anthropometric parameters were extracted from existing records. T2-DDAS, previously validated in a Western population, was administered. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), using IBM SPSS, R, and AMOS software. The T2-DDAS demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.91). CFA yielded satisfactory fit indices (χ² = 1036.92, RMSEA = 0.07, TLI = 0.905, CFI = 0.918), supporting the construct validity of T2-DDAS for the Indian population. The T2-DDAS is a valid and reliable tool for assessing DD in Indian patients with T2D.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83681-0
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric validation of type 2 Diabetes Distress Assessment System in an Indian type 2 diabetes population

Nidhi Kadam, Anagha Vyawahare, Diptika Tiwari, Pramod Tripathi et al.
5 citations
Scientific Reports
Diabetes Management and Education
1.79
article

Psychometric validation of type 2 Diabetes Distress Assessment System in an Indian type 2 diabetes population

Nidhi Kadam, Anagha Vyawahare, Diptika Tiwari, Pramod Tripathi, B Sharma, Malhar Ganla, Thejas Kathrikolly
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Diabetes distress (DD) significantly burdens and negatively impacts self-management and health outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Early detection and management of DD are crucial for effective T2D management. The Diabetes Distress Assessment System (T2-DDAS) is a recently validated tool for measuring DD, but its psychometric properties in non-Western populations, such as India, have not been evaluated. This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of T2-DDAS in Indian patients with T2D. Data from 408 T2D patients enrolled in a one-year diabetes management program at the Freedom from Diabetes Clinic in Pune, India, from January to March 2024, were analyzed. Sociodemographic characteristics, medical history, and anthropometric parameters were extracted from existing records. T2-DDAS, previously validated in a Western population, was administered. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), using IBM SPSS, R, and AMOS software. The T2-DDAS demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.91). CFA yielded satisfactory fit indices (χ² = 1036.92, RMSEA = 0.07, TLI = 0.905, CFI = 0.918), supporting the construct validity of T2-DDAS for the Indian population. The T2-DDAS is a valid and reliable tool for assessing DD in Indian patients with T2D.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Freedom From Diabetes (IN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Diabetes Management and Education
1.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.