Continuous glucose monitoring among adults with type 2 diabetes receiving noninsulin or basal insulin therapy in primary care

Rates of type 2 diabetes (T2D) continue to rise in the United States, with many patients failing to achieve glycemic targets. Primary care providers often serve as the sole clinician managing diabetes. Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) have shown promise in diabetes management, yet their adoption in primary care settings, especially among patients with T2D not using intensive insulin therapy, remains limited. We sought to evaluate the impact of CGM use on glycemic control in patients with T2D not using insulin and those using basal but not bolus insulin in a primary care setting. CGM use was associated with a significantly greater reduction in HbA1c (-0.62%, p < 0.01) compared with matched controls at 3 months (n = 182). Patients showed improvements in time in range (39.7-61.9%, p < 0.0001), time > 180 mg/dL (60.1-37.9%, p < 0.001), time > 250 mg/dL (27.6-8.5%, p < 0.001), mean estimated glucose value (212 mg/dL to 173 mg/dL, p < 0.001) and glucose management indicator (8.39-7.46%, p < 0.001). CGM use in a primary care setting compared to usual care significantly improved glycemic control in T2D patients not on bolus insulin, irrespective of treatment with non-insulin or basal insulin. This suggests potential for broader CGM integration in primary care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83548-4
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Continuous glucose monitoring among adults with type 2 diabetes receiving noninsulin or basal insulin therapy in primary care

John J. Clary, Stephen Shields, Roy Thomas, Elizabeth L. Ciemins et al.
12 citations
Scientific Reports
Diabetes Management and Research
4.29
article

Continuous glucose monitoring among adults with type 2 diabetes receiving noninsulin or basal insulin therapy in primary care

John J. Clary, Stephen Shields, Roy Thomas, Elizabeth L. Ciemins, J. Scott Durham, Joseph Moran
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Rates of type 2 diabetes (T2D) continue to rise in the United States, with many patients failing to achieve glycemic targets. Primary care providers often serve as the sole clinician managing diabetes. Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) have shown promise in diabetes management, yet their adoption in primary care settings, especially among patients with T2D not using intensive insulin therapy, remains limited. We sought to evaluate the impact of CGM use on glycemic control in patients with T2D not using insulin and those using basal but not bolus insulin in a primary care setting. CGM use was associated with a significantly greater reduction in HbA1c (-0.62%, p < 0.01) compared with matched controls at 3 months (n = 182). Patients showed improvements in time in range (39.7-61.9%, p < 0.0001), time > 180 mg/dL (60.1-37.9%, p < 0.001), time > 250 mg/dL (27.6-8.5%, p < 0.001), mean estimated glucose value (212 mg/dL to 173 mg/dL, p < 0.001) and glucose management indicator (8.39-7.46%, p < 0.001). CGM use in a primary care setting compared to usual care significantly improved glycemic control in T2D patients not on bolus insulin, irrespective of treatment with non-insulin or basal insulin. This suggests potential for broader CGM integration in primary care.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
American Medical Group Association (US), Dexcom (United States) (US), Piedmont HealthCare (US)
Dexcom
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Diabetes Management and Research
4.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.