Impact of Integrated Nursing and Rehabilitation on Recovery Outcomes after Pediatric Appendectomy

Background: Appendicitis is a common surgical emergency in children, often requiring appendectomy. Traditional postoperative care focuses on nursing protocols for pain management and mobility. Recent evidence suggests that integrated care models combining nursing and rehabilitation services can enhance recovery outcomes. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of such a model in pediatric appendectomy patients. Objective: To evaluate the impact of an integrated nursing and rehabilitation care model on recovery outcomes in children undergoing appendectomies. Methods: This study was conducted over one year with 42 pediatric appendectomy patients randomly assigned to either an integrated care group or a standard care group. The integrated care group received combined nursing and rehabilitation services, while the standard care group received traditional postoperative care. Immediate postoperative recovery was evaluated using pain scores, wound healing assessments, and mobility tests at 24, 48, and 72 hours post-surgery. Long-term functional outcomes, including return to school and physical activity levels, were assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months. Patient and family satisfaction were measured at discharge and follow-up intervals. Results: The integrated care group demonstrated significantly better outcomes: mean pain scores at 72 hours were 2.9 (SD = 0.3) compared to 3.8 (SD = 0.5) in the standard care group (p < 0.01). Wound healing scores at 72 hours were 1.4 (SD = 0.4) versus 2.3 (SD = 0.4) (p < 0.01). Mobility (TUG) scores improved from 9.0 (SD = 0.4) to 8.1 (SD = 0.4) (p < 0.01). Physical activity scores were 3.4 (SD = 0.6) at 1 month, 4.0 (SD = 0.4) at 3 months, and 4.4 (SD = 0.5) at 6 months, compared to 3.0 (SD = 0.5), 3.2 (SD = 0.6), and 3.6 (SD = 0.4) in the standard care group, respectively (p < 0.01). The integrated care group also had fewer days absent from school (mean 4.9, SD = 1.4 vs. 8.7, SD = 2.0) and higher patient satisfaction scores at all time points (p < 0.01). Conclusion: The integrated nursing and rehabilitation care model significantly improved recovery outcomes for pediatric appendectomy patients, demonstrating better pain management, wound healing, mobility, and long-term functional recovery. These findings support the adoption of integrated care models to enhance postoperative recovery in pediatric surgical patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Published
2024-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71000/ijhr52
Primary Topic
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Integrated Nursing and Rehabilitation on Recovery Outcomes after Pediatric Appendectomy

Aiman Arshad, Farrukh Murtaza, Zubeira Syed Ani, Muhammad Bin Zia
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
article

Impact of Integrated Nursing and Rehabilitation on Recovery Outcomes after Pediatric Appendectomy

Aiman Arshad, Farrukh Murtaza, Zubeira Syed Ani, Muhammad Bin Zia
article en

Abstract

Background: Appendicitis is a common surgical emergency in children, often requiring appendectomy. Traditional postoperative care focuses on nursing protocols for pain management and mobility. Recent evidence suggests that integrated care models combining nursing and rehabilitation services can enhance recovery outcomes. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of such a model in pediatric appendectomy patients. Objective: To evaluate the impact of an integrated nursing and rehabilitation care model on recovery outcomes in children undergoing appendectomies. Methods: This study was conducted over one year with 42 pediatric appendectomy patients randomly assigned to either an integrated care group or a standard care group. The integrated care group received combined nursing and rehabilitation services, while the standard care group received traditional postoperative care. Immediate postoperative recovery was evaluated using pain scores, wound healing assessments, and mobility tests at 24, 48, and 72 hours post-surgery. Long-term functional outcomes, including return to school and physical activity levels, were assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months. Patient and family satisfaction were measured at discharge and follow-up intervals. Results: The integrated care group demonstrated significantly better outcomes: mean pain scores at 72 hours were 2.9 (SD = 0.3) compared to 3.8 (SD = 0.5) in the standard care group (p < 0.01). Wound healing scores at 72 hours were 1.4 (SD = 0.4) versus 2.3 (SD = 0.4) (p < 0.01). Mobility (TUG) scores improved from 9.0 (SD = 0.4) to 8.1 (SD = 0.4) (p < 0.01). Physical activity scores were 3.4 (SD = 0.6) at 1 month, 4.0 (SD = 0.4) at 3 months, and 4.4 (SD = 0.5) at 6 months, compared to 3.0 (SD = 0.5), 3.2 (SD = 0.6), and 3.6 (SD = 0.4) in the standard care group, respectively (p < 0.01). The integrated care group also had fewer days absent from school (mean 4.9, SD = 1.4 vs. 8.7, SD = 2.0) and higher patient satisfaction scores at all time points (p < 0.01). Conclusion: The integrated nursing and rehabilitation care model significantly improved recovery outcomes for pediatric appendectomy patients, demonstrating better pain management, wound healing, mobility, and long-term functional recovery. These findings support the adoption of integrated care models to enhance postoperative recovery in pediatric surgical patients.

Insights-Journal of Health and RehabilitationVol. 2(2 (Health & Allied))
Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center (PK), University of Lahore (PK), Dhulikhel Hospital (NP), Superior University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.