What do Expert Teachers Think about Grading? - A Preliminary Report from Croatia

Assessment of students’ progress is an integral part of teachers’ considerations and actions. The extent to which students have acquired certain teaching content, achieved the set goals, improved their abilities or formed attitudes is assessed by teachers, parents, and education policy makers. In a large number of countries, students’ progress is measured by grades, either as letter or numerical grades. Grading has been a bone of contention in pedagogical circles, as there is no consensus on the basic questions: what should be graded, when the grading process should start, what is the purpose of grading, which elements should be taken into account while grading and whether grades are necessary at all. The aim of this study was to determine the attitudes of primary school teachers to grading. A qualitative study was conducted, using the focus group (n = 8). The members of the focus group were expert teachers promoted to the ranks of teacher advisor or teacher excellent advisor. The interview was conducted as a semi-structured interview. After that, a content analysis was carried out and the results were classified into categories. The obtained results revealed that expert teachers have different experiences and opinions based on which they create various implicit pedagogical approaches to grading students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55549/epess.876
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What do Expert Teachers Think about Grading? - A Preliminary Report from Croatia

Marina Đuranović, Irena Klasnić, Tomislava Vidić
The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

What do Expert Teachers Think about Grading? - A Preliminary Report from Croatia

Marina Đuranović, Irena Klasnić, Tomislava Vidić
article en

Abstract

Assessment of students’ progress is an integral part of teachers’ considerations and actions. The extent to which students have acquired certain teaching content, achieved the set goals, improved their abilities or formed attitudes is assessed by teachers, parents, and education policy makers. In a large number of countries, students’ progress is measured by grades, either as letter or numerical grades. Grading has been a bone of contention in pedagogical circles, as there is no consensus on the basic questions: what should be graded, when the grading process should start, what is the purpose of grading, which elements should be taken into account while grading and whether grades are necessary at all. The aim of this study was to determine the attitudes of primary school teachers to grading. A qualitative study was conducted, using the focus group (n = 8). The members of the focus group were expert teachers promoted to the ranks of teacher advisor or teacher excellent advisor. The interview was conducted as a semi-structured interview. After that, a content analysis was carried out and the results were classified into categories. The obtained results revealed that expert teachers have different experiences and opinions based on which they create various implicit pedagogical approaches to grading students.

The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social SciencesVol. 39
University of Zagreb (HR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.