COMPARISON OF TELEREHABILITATION VS. CLINICAL SETUP REHABILITATION IN TKR PATIENTS

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a common condition among older adults, often leading to significant pain and disability. Total knee replacement (TKR) is frequently recommended for severe cases to alleviate symptoms and restore function. However, effective post-operative rehabilitation is crucial to maximize recovery outcomes and improve quality of life. Telerehabilitation is emerging as an accessible alternative to conventional physiotherapy, potentially enhancing patient adherence and functional outcomes while minimizing the need for in-person visits. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of telerehabilitation compared to conventional physiotherapy in improving knee function and patient outcomes following TKR. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at Horizon Hospital in Lahore, including 36 participants aged over 65 years, all of whom had undergone TKR. Participants were randomly assigned to either Group A (telerehabilitation) or Group B (conventional clinical therapy), with 18 individuals in each group. Data collection tools included the Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living (KOS-ADLS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) surveys, supplemented by electronic goniometer measurements of knee flexion and extension. Assessments were conducted at baseline and at the fourth week to compare outcomes statistically between the two groups. Results: In the fourth week, Group A (telerehabilitation) showed significantly better outcomes in knee function and pain management compared to Group B (conventional therapy). KOOS-ADL scores improved significantly in Group A (p = 0.001) compared to Group B. WOMAC scores also demonstrated significant improvement in Group A (p = 0.000). Furthermore, knee flexion increased substantially for Group A, reaching 121.1° (p = 0.031), and knee extension deficit reduced to 2.6° (p = 0.028). Conclusion: Telerehabilitation is an effective post-operative intervention for TKR, enhancing knee function, reducing pain, and improving overall patient satisfaction. This approach provides a practical and accessible solution, particularly beneficial for older adults with limited mobility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71000/ijhr87
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARISON OF TELEREHABILITATION VS. CLINICAL SETUP REHABILITATION IN TKR PATIENTS

Muhammad Shahid, Irfan Ahmed, M. Jamil, Muhammad Junaid Ijaz Gondal et al.
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

COMPARISON OF TELEREHABILITATION VS. CLINICAL SETUP REHABILITATION IN TKR PATIENTS

Muhammad Shahid, Irfan Ahmed, M. Jamil, Muhammad Junaid Ijaz Gondal, Iqra Ikram, Adnan Hashim
article en

Abstract

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a common condition among older adults, often leading to significant pain and disability. Total knee replacement (TKR) is frequently recommended for severe cases to alleviate symptoms and restore function. However, effective post-operative rehabilitation is crucial to maximize recovery outcomes and improve quality of life. Telerehabilitation is emerging as an accessible alternative to conventional physiotherapy, potentially enhancing patient adherence and functional outcomes while minimizing the need for in-person visits. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of telerehabilitation compared to conventional physiotherapy in improving knee function and patient outcomes following TKR. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at Horizon Hospital in Lahore, including 36 participants aged over 65 years, all of whom had undergone TKR. Participants were randomly assigned to either Group A (telerehabilitation) or Group B (conventional clinical therapy), with 18 individuals in each group. Data collection tools included the Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living (KOS-ADLS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) surveys, supplemented by electronic goniometer measurements of knee flexion and extension. Assessments were conducted at baseline and at the fourth week to compare outcomes statistically between the two groups. Results: In the fourth week, Group A (telerehabilitation) showed significantly better outcomes in knee function and pain management compared to Group B (conventional therapy). KOOS-ADL scores improved significantly in Group A (p = 0.001) compared to Group B. WOMAC scores also demonstrated significant improvement in Group A (p = 0.000). Furthermore, knee flexion increased substantially for Group A, reaching 121.1° (p = 0.031), and knee extension deficit reduced to 2.6° (p = 0.028). Conclusion: Telerehabilitation is an effective post-operative intervention for TKR, enhancing knee function, reducing pain, and improving overall patient satisfaction. This approach provides a practical and accessible solution, particularly beneficial for older adults with limited mobility.

Insights-Journal of Health and RehabilitationVol. 2(2 (Health & Rehab))
University of Lahore (PK), Superior University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.