A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EXTRACTION AND QUANTIFICATION METHODS OF PROTEIN ISOLATED FROM BEANS

Background: Beans serve as a significant source of protein, minerals, and plant-derived micronutrients, holding social and economic importance. Their consumption is linked to numerous health benefits, including reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease, obesity, and diabetes. Plant-based proteins are also environmentally advantageous, as their production requires fewer natural resources and results in a smaller carbon footprint than animal-derived proteins. This study explores protein extraction methods from beans and assesses analytical techniques for protein quantification. Objective: To examine various protein extraction and quantification techniques from beans, focusing on four primary analytical methods: SDS-PAGE, Bradford, Lowry, and spectrophotometry. Methods: Proteins were extracted from bean samples using standardized cell disruption, solubilization, enrichment, and digestion techniques. Four analytical methods were then applied to quantify the proteins: SDS-PAGE (for molecular weight separation), Bradford (dye-binding assay), Lowry (colorimetric assay), and spectrophotometry (UV absorption at 280 nm). Each method’s precision, sensitivity, and compatibility with bean protein extracts were evaluated. Results: SDS-PAGE effectively separated proteins in the 5-250 kDa range with a 95% consistency in molecular weight determination. The Bradford method detected protein concentrations as low as 1 µg/mL, while the Lowry method demonstrated a 10-fold sensitivity increase over spectrophotometry, which was limited by UV interference. Both Bradford and Lowry were modified for specific protein compositions, with Bradford showing less interference. Conclusion: The Bradford method demonstrated the greatest adaptability and minimal interference in bean protein quantification, whereas SDS-PAGE proved optimal for protein fraction analysis. These findings suggest the continued development of extraction and quantification techniques to meet the increasing demand for plant-based proteins.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71000/ijhr113
Primary Topic
Phytase and its Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EXTRACTION AND QUANTIFICATION METHODS OF PROTEIN ISOLATED FROM BEANS

Saliha Khalid, Drakhshaan, Alaa Ghaleb Alsawwa, Md Kamrul Islam et al.
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Phytase and its Applications
article

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EXTRACTION AND QUANTIFICATION METHODS OF PROTEIN ISOLATED FROM BEANS

Saliha Khalid, Drakhshaan, Alaa Ghaleb Alsawwa, Md Kamrul Islam, Khizra Hashmat, Ahmad Ibne Yousaf, Abu Baker Sidiq, Muhammad Sikandar Subhani
article en

Abstract

Background: Beans serve as a significant source of protein, minerals, and plant-derived micronutrients, holding social and economic importance. Their consumption is linked to numerous health benefits, including reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease, obesity, and diabetes. Plant-based proteins are also environmentally advantageous, as their production requires fewer natural resources and results in a smaller carbon footprint than animal-derived proteins. This study explores protein extraction methods from beans and assesses analytical techniques for protein quantification. Objective: To examine various protein extraction and quantification techniques from beans, focusing on four primary analytical methods: SDS-PAGE, Bradford, Lowry, and spectrophotometry. Methods: Proteins were extracted from bean samples using standardized cell disruption, solubilization, enrichment, and digestion techniques. Four analytical methods were then applied to quantify the proteins: SDS-PAGE (for molecular weight separation), Bradford (dye-binding assay), Lowry (colorimetric assay), and spectrophotometry (UV absorption at 280 nm). Each method’s precision, sensitivity, and compatibility with bean protein extracts were evaluated. Results: SDS-PAGE effectively separated proteins in the 5-250 kDa range with a 95% consistency in molecular weight determination. The Bradford method detected protein concentrations as low as 1 µg/mL, while the Lowry method demonstrated a 10-fold sensitivity increase over spectrophotometry, which was limited by UV interference. Both Bradford and Lowry were modified for specific protein compositions, with Bradford showing less interference. Conclusion: The Bradford method demonstrated the greatest adaptability and minimal interference in bean protein quantification, whereas SDS-PAGE proved optimal for protein fraction analysis. These findings suggest the continued development of extraction and quantification techniques to meet the increasing demand for plant-based proteins.

Insights-Journal of Health and RehabilitationVol. 2(2 (Health & Allied))
Kadir Has University (TR), Gomal University (PK), Riphah International University (PK), University of Dhaka (BD), Minhaj University Lahore (PK), University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (PK)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Phytase and its Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.