IMPACT OF BLOOD FLOW RESTRICTION TRAINING (BFRT) VERSUS TRADITIONAL STRENGTH TRAINING IN KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS ON PAIN AND QOL

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is the third leading cause of disability worldwide, significantly impacting pain, physical function, and quality of life (QoL). Among its types, knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is the most prevalent, affecting over 80% of individuals with OA. Effective conservative management is crucial for mitigating its physical and social burden. Exercise therapy, including strength training, has been widely utilized; however, the comparative efficacy of blood flow restriction training (BFRT) and traditional strength training remains underexplored. Objective: This study aimed to compare the impact of BFRT and traditional strength training on pain and QoL in patients with KOA. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted between March 2024 and August 2024, enrolling 38 patients with KOA using a purposive sampling technique. Participants aged 40–70 years with clinically and radiologically confirmed KOA experiencing moderate-to-severe symptoms were included. Patients with contraindications to BFRT, such as vascular disorders or recent surgeries, were excluded. The interventions included BFRT with low-load resistance and traditional high-load strength training. Pain and QoL were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), respectively. Ethical considerations were followed throughout the study, and SPSS version 24 was used for statistical analysis. Results: Baseline VAS scores were 7.4 ± 1.1 for the BFRT group and 7.3 ± 1.2 for the traditional group (p = 0.87). Post-intervention, VAS improved significantly in both groups, with BFRT showing a greater reduction (3.2 ± 1.0) compared to the traditional group (4.5 ± 1.1, p = 0.01). KOOS scores improved from 48.6 ± 6.9 to 72.3 ± 7.5 in the BFRT group and from 47.9 ± 7.2 to 64.7 ± 8.1 in the traditional group (p = 0.03). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements, with BFRT showing superior results. Conclusion: Both BFRT and traditional strength training significantly improved pain and QoL in KOA patients, with BFRT yielding more pronounced benefits. BFRT offers a promising low-load alternative for managing pain and enhancing QoL in individuals with KOA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71000/ijhr205
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IMPACT OF BLOOD FLOW RESTRICTION TRAINING (BFRT) VERSUS TRADITIONAL STRENGTH TRAINING IN KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS ON PAIN AND QOL

Ahmad Arif, Muhammad Danial Baig Chughtai, Muhammad Baber Ikram, Abdul Hannan et al.
1 citations
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
0.72
article

IMPACT OF BLOOD FLOW RESTRICTION TRAINING (BFRT) VERSUS TRADITIONAL STRENGTH TRAINING IN KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS ON PAIN AND QOL

Ahmad Arif, Muhammad Danial Baig Chughtai, Muhammad Baber Ikram, Abdul Hannan, Umama Uzair, Aleena Jafar, Resha Manahil
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is the third leading cause of disability worldwide, significantly impacting pain, physical function, and quality of life (QoL). Among its types, knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is the most prevalent, affecting over 80% of individuals with OA. Effective conservative management is crucial for mitigating its physical and social burden. Exercise therapy, including strength training, has been widely utilized; however, the comparative efficacy of blood flow restriction training (BFRT) and traditional strength training remains underexplored. Objective: This study aimed to compare the impact of BFRT and traditional strength training on pain and QoL in patients with KOA. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted between March 2024 and August 2024, enrolling 38 patients with KOA using a purposive sampling technique. Participants aged 40–70 years with clinically and radiologically confirmed KOA experiencing moderate-to-severe symptoms were included. Patients with contraindications to BFRT, such as vascular disorders or recent surgeries, were excluded. The interventions included BFRT with low-load resistance and traditional high-load strength training. Pain and QoL were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), respectively. Ethical considerations were followed throughout the study, and SPSS version 24 was used for statistical analysis. Results: Baseline VAS scores were 7.4 ± 1.1 for the BFRT group and 7.3 ± 1.2 for the traditional group (p = 0.87). Post-intervention, VAS improved significantly in both groups, with BFRT showing a greater reduction (3.2 ± 1.0) compared to the traditional group (4.5 ± 1.1, p = 0.01). KOOS scores improved from 48.6 ± 6.9 to 72.3 ± 7.5 in the BFRT group and from 47.9 ± 7.2 to 64.7 ± 8.1 in the traditional group (p = 0.03). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements, with BFRT showing superior results. Conclusion: Both BFRT and traditional strength training significantly improved pain and QoL in KOA patients, with BFRT yielding more pronounced benefits. BFRT offers a promising low-load alternative for managing pain and enhancing QoL in individuals with KOA.

Insights-Journal of Health and RehabilitationVol. 2(2 (Health & Allied))
University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir (PK), University of Karachi (PK), Riphah International University (PK), Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science and Technology (PK), GIFT University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
0.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.