Differences in spatiotemporal dynamics for processing specific semantic categories: An EEG study

Semantic processing is an essential mechanism in human language comprehension and has profound implications for speech brain-computer interface technologies. Despite recent advances in brain imaging techniques and data analysis algorithms, the mechanisms underlying human brain semantic representations remain a topic of debate, specifically whether this occurs through the activation of selectively separated cortical regions or via a network of distributed and overlapping regions. This study investigates spatiotemporal neural representation during the perception of semantic words related to faces, numbers, and animals using electroencephalography. Source-level analysis focuses on contrasting neural responses to different semantic categories. Critical intervals used in the source contrast analysis are defined using the peak duration of global field power. Effective connectivity, determined through a causality analysis of brain regions activated for semantic processing, is explored. The findings reveal the necessity of a distributed network of regions for processing specific semantic categories and provide evidence suggesting the existence of a neural substrate for semantic representations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83417-0
Citations
2
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in spatiotemporal dynamics for processing specific semantic categories: An EEG study

Hyosung Joo, Jihwan Woo, T Le, Dong-Seok Kim et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
0.69
article

Differences in spatiotemporal dynamics for processing specific semantic categories: An EEG study

Hyosung Joo, Jihwan Woo, T Le, Dong-Seok Kim, Do Anh Quan Luong
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Semantic processing is an essential mechanism in human language comprehension and has profound implications for speech brain-computer interface technologies. Despite recent advances in brain imaging techniques and data analysis algorithms, the mechanisms underlying human brain semantic representations remain a topic of debate, specifically whether this occurs through the activation of selectively separated cortical regions or via a network of distributed and overlapping regions. This study investigates spatiotemporal neural representation during the perception of semantic words related to faces, numbers, and animals using electroencephalography. Source-level analysis focuses on contrasting neural responses to different semantic categories. Critical intervals used in the source contrast analysis are defined using the peak duration of global field power. Effective connectivity, determined through a causality analysis of brain regions activated for semantic processing, is explored. The findings reveal the necessity of a distributed network of regions for processing specific semantic categories and provide evidence suggesting the existence of a neural substrate for semantic representations.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Ulsan College (KR), University of Ulsan (KR), Ulsan University Hospital (KR)
National Research Foundation, National Research Foundation of Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Differences in spatiotemporal dynamics for processing specific semantic categories: An EEG study — Hyosung Joo, Jihwan Woo, et al. · Scientific Reports (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS