Understanding the ignition delay of E20 gasolines and E20 gasoline surrogates

The autoignition behaviour of E20 gasolines is investigated experimentally using both a rapid compression machine and a high-pressure shock tube. A detailed chemical kinetic model is employed to simulate the data. Four E20 gasolines are studied, two of which are formulated from refinery streams, thereby representing a “real” fuel, while the other two are surrogate blends, which can also be modelled, and which are designed to approximately represent the RON and MON of the fuels made from the refinery streams. The measured ignition delay times (IDTs) of the surrogate fuels are always measured to be shorter than those of the “real” fuels at all temperatures and equivalence ratios, although this is most apparent in the negative temperature coefficient (NTC) regime. This deviation can be, at least partly, explained by the fact that the RON of the surrogates is slightly lower than the RON of the corresponding “real” fuels. For the surrogate fuels, there is an under-prediction of IDTs using the Galway GS_MechV1 chemical kinetic mechanism compared to the experimental results. This under-prediction is found to be more prominent at an equivalence ratio of 0.5. A modification to the original surrogates was made which increased the RON of the surrogate fuels and brought the simulated IDTs closer to the experimental measurements. • Measurements of autoignition delay of a fully formulated E20 gasoline are presented. • Autoignition results of surrogate E20 formulations are compared with simulations. • E20 surrogate results are compared with the fully formulated gasoline measurements. • Surrogate composition changes are made to match results to that of the real fuel.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fuel
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.134111
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the ignition delay of E20 gasolines and E20 gasoline surrogates

Henry J. Curran, Vaibhav Patel, Roger Cracknell, Filimonas Kaliafetis
1 citations
Fuel
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
0.22
article

Understanding the ignition delay of E20 gasolines and E20 gasoline surrogates

Henry J. Curran, Vaibhav Patel, Roger Cracknell, Filimonas Kaliafetis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The autoignition behaviour of E20 gasolines is investigated experimentally using both a rapid compression machine and a high-pressure shock tube. A detailed chemical kinetic model is employed to simulate the data. Four E20 gasolines are studied, two of which are formulated from refinery streams, thereby representing a “real” fuel, while the other two are surrogate blends, which can also be modelled, and which are designed to approximately represent the RON and MON of the fuels made from the refinery streams. The measured ignition delay times (IDTs) of the surrogate fuels are always measured to be shorter than those of the “real” fuels at all temperatures and equivalence ratios, although this is most apparent in the negative temperature coefficient (NTC) regime. This deviation can be, at least partly, explained by the fact that the RON of the surrogates is slightly lower than the RON of the corresponding “real” fuels. For the surrogate fuels, there is an under-prediction of IDTs using the Galway GS_MechV1 chemical kinetic mechanism compared to the experimental results. This under-prediction is found to be more prominent at an equivalence ratio of 0.5. A modification to the original surrogates was made which increased the RON of the surrogate fuels and brought the simulated IDTs closer to the experimental measurements. • Measurements of autoignition delay of a fully formulated E20 gasoline are presented. • Autoignition results of surrogate E20 formulations are compared with simulations. • E20 surrogate results are compared with the fully formulated gasoline measurements. • Surrogate composition changes are made to match results to that of the real fuel.

FuelVol. 386
Combustion Institute (US), Shell (United Kingdom) (GB), University of Bath (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
0.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Understanding the ignition delay of E20 gasolines and E20 gasoline surrogates — Henry J. Curran, Vaibhav Patel, et al. · Fuel (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS