Deep conservation complemented by novelty and innovation in the insect eye ground plan

A spectacular diversity of forms and features allow species to thrive in different environments, yet some structures remain relatively unchanged. Insect compound eyes are easily recognizable despite dramatic differences in visual abilities across species. It is unknown whether distant insect species use similar or different mechanisms to pattern their eyes or what types of genetic changes produce diversity of form and function. We find that flies, mosquitos, butterflies, moths, beetles, wasps, honeybees, and crickets use homologous developmental programs to pattern their retinas. Transcription factor expression can be used to establish homology of different photoreceptor (PR) types across the insects: Prospero (Pros) for R7, Spalt (Sal) for R7+R8, and Defective proventriculus (Dve) for R1-6. Using gene knockout (CRISPR/Cas9) in houseflies, butterflies, and crickets and gene knockdown (RNAi) in beetles, we found that like <i>Drosophila</i>, EGFR and Sevenless (Sev) signaling pathways are required to recruit motion and color vision PRs, though <i>Drosophila</i> have a decreased reliance on Sev signaling relative to other insects. Despite morphological and physiological variation across species, retina development passes through a highly conserved phylotypic stage when the unit eyes (ommatidia) are first patterned. This patterning process likely represents an "insect eye ground plan" that is established by an ancient developmental program. We identify three types of developmental patterning modifications (ground plan modification, nonstochastic patterns, and specialized regions) that allow for the diversification of insect eyes. We suggest that developmental divergence after the ground plan is established is responsible for the exceptional diversity observed across insect visual systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2416562122
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep conservation complemented by novelty and innovation in the insect eye ground plan

Ke Gao, Antoine Donati, Eleanor R. Terner, Julia A. Ainsworth et al.
2 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
0.54
article

Deep conservation complemented by novelty and innovation in the insect eye ground plan

Ke Gao, Antoine Donati, Eleanor R. Terner, Julia A. Ainsworth, Michael Perry, Di Wu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

A spectacular diversity of forms and features allow species to thrive in different environments, yet some structures remain relatively unchanged. Insect compound eyes are easily recognizable despite dramatic differences in visual abilities across species. It is unknown whether distant insect species use similar or different mechanisms to pattern their eyes or what types of genetic changes produce diversity of form and function. We find that flies, mosquitos, butterflies, moths, beetles, wasps, honeybees, and crickets use homologous developmental programs to pattern their retinas. Transcription factor expression can be used to establish homology of different photoreceptor (PR) types across the insects: Prospero (Pros) for R7, Spalt (Sal) for R7+R8, and Defective proventriculus (Dve) for R1-6. Using gene knockout (CRISPR/Cas9) in houseflies, butterflies, and crickets and gene knockdown (RNAi) in beetles, we found that like <i>Drosophila</i>, EGFR and Sevenless (Sev) signaling pathways are required to recruit motion and color vision PRs, though <i>Drosophila</i> have a decreased reliance on Sev signaling relative to other insects. Despite morphological and physiological variation across species, retina development passes through a highly conserved phylotypic stage when the unit eyes (ommatidia) are first patterned. This patterning process likely represents an "insect eye ground plan" that is established by an ancient developmental program. We identify three types of developmental patterning modifications (ground plan modification, nonstochastic patterns, and specialized regions) that allow for the diversification of insect eyes. We suggest that developmental divergence after the ground plan is established is responsible for the exceptional diversity observed across insect visual systems.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(1)
University of California San Diego (US)
University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.