Mitigating salinity stress on tomato growth, water regime, gas exchange, and yield with the application of QuitoMax

This study assessed the intensity of salt stress in the two tomato varieties by measuring variables associated with the water regime, chlorophyll content, normalized difference vegetation index, gas exchange, and yield. The cultivars Amalia and Claudia, which represent tolerance and susceptibility to salinity, were evaluated. Three treatments were established in plastic pots, using a completely randomized design: T1, saline soil (ECse = 6.9 dS m<sup>-1</sup> without QuitoMax application); T2, nonsaline soil (ECse = 0.95 dS m <sup>-1</sup> with QuitoMax application); and T3, saline soil (ECse = 6.9 dS m<sup>-1</sup>) with QuitoMax application. The QuitoMax was applied at a rate of 300 mg L<sup>-1</sup>, during the flowering phenophase. QuitoMax caused an increase in the variables evaluated in both varieties (tolerant and susceptible) of tomato, with a lower contribution of QuitoMax to the variables related to water regime and the greatest contributions to chlorophyll content and photosynthetic activity. QuitoMax contributed positively to all variables and was superior to stress intensity for most of the variables evaluated in the tolerant variety (Amalia), except for stem thickness and the number of flowers per bunch. In the susceptible variety (Claudia), the five variables of stress intensity exceeded the contribution of QuitoMax, with the strongest effects on osmotic potential, fruit mass, and yield per plant. The present work demonstrates the feasibility of using this biostimulant to increase the tolerance of tolerant varieties and maintain tolerance in tomato varieties susceptible to salinity, reducing the intensity of saline stress and increasing plant performance under salinity conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-82211-2
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mitigating salinity stress on tomato growth, water regime, gas exchange, and yield with the application of QuitoMax

Jae‐Ho Shin, Alan Mário Zuffo, Fábio Steiner, Jorge González Aguilera et al.
4 citations
Scientific Reports
Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
2.40
article

Mitigating salinity stress on tomato growth, water regime, gas exchange, and yield with the application of QuitoMax

Jae‐Ho Shin, Alan Mário Zuffo, Fábio Steiner, Jorge González Aguilera, Carlos Ávila Amador, Rafael Felippe Ratke, Leandris Argentel‐Martínez, Paulo Eduardo Teodoro, Ofelda Peñuelas‐Rubio, Uğur Azizoğlu
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study assessed the intensity of salt stress in the two tomato varieties by measuring variables associated with the water regime, chlorophyll content, normalized difference vegetation index, gas exchange, and yield. The cultivars Amalia and Claudia, which represent tolerance and susceptibility to salinity, were evaluated. Three treatments were established in plastic pots, using a completely randomized design: T1, saline soil (ECse = 6.9 dS m<sup>-1</sup> without QuitoMax application); T2, nonsaline soil (ECse = 0.95 dS m <sup>-1</sup> with QuitoMax application); and T3, saline soil (ECse = 6.9 dS m<sup>-1</sup>) with QuitoMax application. The QuitoMax was applied at a rate of 300 mg L<sup>-1</sup>, during the flowering phenophase. QuitoMax caused an increase in the variables evaluated in both varieties (tolerant and susceptible) of tomato, with a lower contribution of QuitoMax to the variables related to water regime and the greatest contributions to chlorophyll content and photosynthetic activity. QuitoMax contributed positively to all variables and was superior to stress intensity for most of the variables evaluated in the tolerant variety (Amalia), except for stem thickness and the number of flowers per bunch. In the susceptible variety (Claudia), the five variables of stress intensity exceeded the contribution of QuitoMax, with the strongest effects on osmotic potential, fruit mass, and yield per plant. The present work demonstrates the feasibility of using this biostimulant to increase the tolerance of tolerant varieties and maintain tolerance in tomato varieties susceptible to salinity, reducing the intensity of saline stress and increasing plant performance under salinity conditions.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (BR), Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul (BR), Kyungpook National University (KR), Tecnológico Nacional de México (MX), Kayseri Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Universidade Estadual do Maranhão (BR), Kayseri Üniversitesi (TR), Erciyes University (TR)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
2.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.