Unmasking Approaches and Errors to Synthesis-Type Problems: Insights from Undergraduate Chemistry Students

This study aimed to uncover common difficulties and possible areas for improvement by focusing on the approaches and errors made by 3rd-year undergraduate chemistry students in solving organic synthesis problems. The study employed a purposive sampling technique to select 112 undergraduate chemistry major students to participate in this study. Students’ responses to synthesis-type problems from mid-semester examinations within the framework of a synthetic methodology course in a Ghanaian University were examined. The primary data collection tool was a mid-semester examination that employed deductive coding systems to analyze students’ responses. The study’s findings revealed that while many students performed well in identifying and providing reagents for the given reactions, a lot more struggled with other types of synthesis problems. Specifically, the reaction mechanism-type questions recorded the lowest scores and most errors among the synthesis problems. Asignificant number of students (67.0% and 66.1%, respectively) encountered difficulties in drawing complete reaction mechanisms and proposing the synthesis of target molecules, respectively. The results further indicated that students may have relied on rote memorization in solving synthesis problems. Students’ significant errors included the inability to draw resonance structures, expand atoms/bonds, map atoms, generate starting material/chemical equivalent, and draw correct products. However, students showed glimpses of using retrosynthesis analysis through the disconnection approach and exhibited a good usage of arrows in arrow-pushing formalism. The study recommends focused interventions and teaching strategies to enhance students’ understanding of reaction mechanisms, drawing of resonance structures, expanding atoms/bonds, mapping of atoms, starting material generation, and problem-solving skills in organic synthesis. Besides, students should be provided with ample practice for synthesis design by educators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science education international
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v35.i4.5
Primary Topic
Various Chemistry Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unmasking Approaches and Errors to Synthesis-Type Problems: Insights from Undergraduate Chemistry Students

Ernest Koranteng
Science education international
Various Chemistry Research Topics
article

Unmasking Approaches and Errors to Synthesis-Type Problems: Insights from Undergraduate Chemistry Students

Ernest Koranteng
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to uncover common difficulties and possible areas for improvement by focusing on the approaches and errors made by 3rd-year undergraduate chemistry students in solving organic synthesis problems. The study employed a purposive sampling technique to select 112 undergraduate chemistry major students to participate in this study. Students’ responses to synthesis-type problems from mid-semester examinations within the framework of a synthetic methodology course in a Ghanaian University were examined. The primary data collection tool was a mid-semester examination that employed deductive coding systems to analyze students’ responses. The study’s findings revealed that while many students performed well in identifying and providing reagents for the given reactions, a lot more struggled with other types of synthesis problems. Specifically, the reaction mechanism-type questions recorded the lowest scores and most errors among the synthesis problems. Asignificant number of students (67.0% and 66.1%, respectively) encountered difficulties in drawing complete reaction mechanisms and proposing the synthesis of target molecules, respectively. The results further indicated that students may have relied on rote memorization in solving synthesis problems. Students’ significant errors included the inability to draw resonance structures, expand atoms/bonds, map atoms, generate starting material/chemical equivalent, and draw correct products. However, students showed glimpses of using retrosynthesis analysis through the disconnection approach and exhibited a good usage of arrows in arrow-pushing formalism. The study recommends focused interventions and teaching strategies to enhance students’ understanding of reaction mechanisms, drawing of resonance structures, expanding atoms/bonds, mapping of atoms, starting material generation, and problem-solving skills in organic synthesis. Besides, students should be provided with ample practice for synthesis design by educators.

Science education internationalVol. 35(4)
University of Education, Winneba (GH)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Various Chemistry Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.