Teachers’ responses to a case of relational bullying: a typology based on teachers’ strategies and reasoning

Abstract Although there is a growing body of research on teachers’ responses to bullying, the question of how teachers decide to respond is still under-researched. The present paper investigates participants’ intended responses to a case of relational bullying, the structure of the proposed intervention, the implicit aims of that intervention and the teachers’ reasoning. The study is based on a qualitative vignette study with open-ended questions. The sample comprised 38 secondary school teachers (58% female, 42% male). Qualitative content analysis and type formation were used to analyse the data. Ten different (sub)types of teachers’ responses were constructed based on patterns in the way teachers responded regarding things they would do, things they would avoid, and their reasoning: the relaxed, the cautious, the investigator, the impartial, the enlightened, the situation-oriented, the principle-oriented, the responsible, the experienced and the personally-affected type. The findings are interpreted in the light of previous research, and practical implications as well as implications for teacher education are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Psychology of Education
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09980-6
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teachers’ responses to a case of relational bullying: a typology based on teachers’ strategies and reasoning

Antonia Paljakka
2 citations
Social Psychology of Education
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
1.29
article

Teachers’ responses to a case of relational bullying: a typology based on teachers’ strategies and reasoning

Antonia Paljakka
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Although there is a growing body of research on teachers’ responses to bullying, the question of how teachers decide to respond is still under-researched. The present paper investigates participants’ intended responses to a case of relational bullying, the structure of the proposed intervention, the implicit aims of that intervention and the teachers’ reasoning. The study is based on a qualitative vignette study with open-ended questions. The sample comprised 38 secondary school teachers (58% female, 42% male). Qualitative content analysis and type formation were used to analyse the data. Ten different (sub)types of teachers’ responses were constructed based on patterns in the way teachers responded regarding things they would do, things they would avoid, and their reasoning: the relaxed, the cautious, the investigator, the impartial, the enlightened, the situation-oriented, the principle-oriented, the responsible, the experienced and the personally-affected type. The findings are interpreted in the light of previous research, and practical implications as well as implications for teacher education are discussed.

Social Psychology of EducationVol. 28(1)
University of Vienna (AT)
Universität Wien
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.