Differences between STAD and TSTS Cooperative Learning Models on Mathematics Learning Outcomes for Class X Students at Sultan Iskandar Muda Private High School

This study aims to evaluate the differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students taught using two different cooperative learning models: Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) and Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS). This research employs a quasi-experimental method with a quantitative approach. Conducted at SMA Swasta Sultan Iskandar Muda Medan, the study involved two sample classes selected using purposive sampling technique. Class X IPA 7 was designated as Experiment I with the implementation of the TSTS model, while class X IPA 5 served as Experiment II with the STAD model. Data were collected through observation sheets and learning outcome tests consisting of 5 essay questions. Data analysis was performed using t-test with the Independent Sample T-Test technique via IBM SPSS 27 software. The results indicated that the average score of the class taught using the TSTS model was 81.00, while the class taught using the STAD model scored 74.27. Hypothesis testing showed a of 3.128 and a value of 1.672 with a significance level of 0.003 0.05, leading to the rejection of H0 and the acceptance of Ha. In conclusion, the mathematics learning outcomes of students taught with the TSTS cooperative learning model are higher compared to those taught with the STAD cooperative learning model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AURELIA Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57235/aurelia.v4i1.3383
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences between STAD and TSTS Cooperative Learning Models on Mathematics Learning Outcomes for Class X Students at Sultan Iskandar Muda Private High School

Wingston Leornard Sihombing, Novy Any Waruwu
AURELIA Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
article

Differences between STAD and TSTS Cooperative Learning Models on Mathematics Learning Outcomes for Class X Students at Sultan Iskandar Muda Private High School

Wingston Leornard Sihombing, Novy Any Waruwu
article en

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students taught using two different cooperative learning models: Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) and Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS). This research employs a quasi-experimental method with a quantitative approach. Conducted at SMA Swasta Sultan Iskandar Muda Medan, the study involved two sample classes selected using purposive sampling technique. Class X IPA 7 was designated as Experiment I with the implementation of the TSTS model, while class X IPA 5 served as Experiment II with the STAD model. Data were collected through observation sheets and learning outcome tests consisting of 5 essay questions. Data analysis was performed using t-test with the Independent Sample T-Test technique via IBM SPSS 27 software. The results indicated that the average score of the class taught using the TSTS model was 81.00, while the class taught using the STAD model scored 74.27. Hypothesis testing showed a of 3.128 and a value of 1.672 with a significance level of 0.003 0.05, leading to the rejection of H0 and the acceptance of Ha. In conclusion, the mathematics learning outcomes of students taught with the TSTS cooperative learning model are higher compared to those taught with the STAD cooperative learning model.

AURELIA Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat IndonesiaVol. 4(1)
State University of Medan (ID)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.