The Medical, Ethical and Legal Case Against Dual Stabilization

This Viewpoint discusses the medical, ethical and legal conflicts clinicians face with the mandate to equally protect the health of the pregnant person and the fetus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.7078
Primary Topic
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Medical, Ethical and Legal Case Against Dual Stabilization

Benjamin P. Brown, Elizabeth Tobin‐Tyler
JAMA Internal Medicine
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
article

The Medical, Ethical and Legal Case Against Dual Stabilization

Benjamin P. Brown, Elizabeth Tobin‐Tyler
article en

Abstract

This Viewpoint discusses the medical, ethical and legal conflicts clinicians face with the mandate to equally protect the health of the pregnant person and the fetus.

JAMA Internal MedicineVol. 185(4)
Brown University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Medical, Ethical and Legal Case Against Dual Stabilization — Benjamin P. Brown, Elizabeth Tobin‐Tyler · JAMA Internal Medicine (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS