Boosting with Omicron-specific mRNA vaccine or historical SARS-CoV-2 vaccines elicits discriminating immune responses against Omicron variants

Booster vaccinations are highly recommended in combating the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant and its subvariants. However, the optimal booster vaccination strategies and related immune mechanisms with different prior vaccinations are under-revealed. In this study, we systematically evaluated the immune responses in mice and hamsters with different prime-boost regimens before their protective efficacies against Omicron were detected. We found that boosting with Ad5-nCoV, S<sub>WT</sub>-2P or S<sub>Omicron</sub>-6P induced significantly higher levels of neutralization activities against Omicron variants than CoronaVac and ZF2001 by eliciting stronger germinal center (GC) responses. Specifically, S<sub>Omicron</sub>-6P induced even stronger antibody responses against Omicron variants in CoronaVac and Ad5-nCoV-primed animals than non-Omicron-specific vaccines but with limited differences as compared to Ad5-nCoV and S<sub>WT</sub>-2P. In addition, boosting with a specific vaccine has the potential to remodel the existing immune profiles. These findings indicated that adenovirus-vectored vaccines and mRNA vaccines would be more effective than other types of vaccines as booster shots in combating Omicron infections. Moreover, the protective efficacies of the vaccines in booster vaccinations are highly related to GC reactions in secondary lymphatic organs. In summary, these findings provide timely important information on prime-boost regimens and future vaccine design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2024.12.030
Citations
1
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Boosting with Omicron-specific mRNA vaccine or historical SARS-CoV-2 vaccines elicits discriminating immune responses against Omicron variants

Namei Wu, Jiaming Lan, Yan Wu, Xiaoying Jia et al.
1 citations
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
0.39
article

Boosting with Omicron-specific mRNA vaccine or historical SARS-CoV-2 vaccines elicits discriminating immune responses against Omicron variants

Namei Wu, Jiaming Lan, Yan Wu, Xiaoying Jia, Yucai Wang, Sandra Chiu, Entao Li, Minmin Zhou, Yi Wu, Yang Liu, Wei Wang, Yanqiong Shen, Xinghai Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Booster vaccinations are highly recommended in combating the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant and its subvariants. However, the optimal booster vaccination strategies and related immune mechanisms with different prior vaccinations are under-revealed. In this study, we systematically evaluated the immune responses in mice and hamsters with different prime-boost regimens before their protective efficacies against Omicron were detected. We found that boosting with Ad5-nCoV, S<sub>WT</sub>-2P or S<sub>Omicron</sub>-6P induced significantly higher levels of neutralization activities against Omicron variants than CoronaVac and ZF2001 by eliciting stronger germinal center (GC) responses. Specifically, S<sub>Omicron</sub>-6P induced even stronger antibody responses against Omicron variants in CoronaVac and Ad5-nCoV-primed animals than non-Omicron-specific vaccines but with limited differences as compared to Ad5-nCoV and S<sub>WT</sub>-2P. In addition, boosting with a specific vaccine has the potential to remodel the existing immune profiles. These findings indicated that adenovirus-vectored vaccines and mRNA vaccines would be more effective than other types of vaccines as booster shots in combating Omicron infections. Moreover, the protective efficacies of the vaccines in booster vaccinations are highly related to GC reactions in secondary lymphatic organs. In summary, these findings provide timely important information on prime-boost regimens and future vaccine design.

Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica BVol. 15(2)
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Anhui University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Hefei National Center for Physical Sciences at Nanoscale (CN), Wuhan Institute of Virology (CN), Kai Biotech (South Korea) (KR), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
0.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.