Does Merit-based Incentive Payment System Performance Differ Based on Orthopaedic Surgeon Gender?
The observed association between surgeon gender and MIPS performance scores in 2021, with women orthopaedic surgeons achieving slightly higher scores, raises interesting questions about potential differences in practice behaviors, communication styles, care quality, or other unmeasured variables. These findings may reflect true differences in how care is delivered or documented as scored by the MIPS. However, given the small effect size, statistical fragility, and inconsistency across years, there is a chance that this finding may be spurious. That being so, future research should aim to validate or refute these findings by examining a broader range of variables including documentation practices, practice behaviors, institutional differences, potential systemic biases in scoring methodologies, and patient outcomes. Understanding whether these differences are true is important to ensure that performance metrics like MIPS accurately and equitably reflect care quality.
Authors
- Vikram S. Gill (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5214-7923)
- Alejandro M. Holle (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1936-9155)
- Eugenia Lin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2302-0552)
- Henry D. Clarke (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0654-9400)
- Jack M. Haglin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8190-7795)
Institutions
- Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
- Mayo Clinic Hospital (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Published
- 2024-12-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.0000000000003350
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.86