Does Merit-based Incentive Payment System Performance Differ Based on Orthopaedic Surgeon Gender?

The observed association between surgeon gender and MIPS performance scores in 2021, with women orthopaedic surgeons achieving slightly higher scores, raises interesting questions about potential differences in practice behaviors, communication styles, care quality, or other unmeasured variables. These findings may reflect true differences in how care is delivered or documented as scored by the MIPS. However, given the small effect size, statistical fragility, and inconsistency across years, there is a chance that this finding may be spurious. That being so, future research should aim to validate or refute these findings by examining a broader range of variables including documentation practices, practice behaviors, institutional differences, potential systemic biases in scoring methodologies, and patient outcomes. Understanding whether these differences are true is important to ensure that performance metrics like MIPS accurately and equitably reflect care quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.0000000000003350
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Merit-based Incentive Payment System Performance Differ Based on Orthopaedic Surgeon Gender?

Vikram S. Gill, Alejandro M. Holle, Eugenia Lin, Henry D. Clarke et al.
2 citations
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Diversity and Career in Medicine
1.86
article

Does Merit-based Incentive Payment System Performance Differ Based on Orthopaedic Surgeon Gender?

Vikram S. Gill, Alejandro M. Holle, Eugenia Lin, Henry D. Clarke, Jack M. Haglin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The observed association between surgeon gender and MIPS performance scores in 2021, with women orthopaedic surgeons achieving slightly higher scores, raises interesting questions about potential differences in practice behaviors, communication styles, care quality, or other unmeasured variables. These findings may reflect true differences in how care is delivered or documented as scored by the MIPS. However, given the small effect size, statistical fragility, and inconsistency across years, there is a chance that this finding may be spurious. That being so, future research should aim to validate or refute these findings by examining a broader range of variables including documentation practices, practice behaviors, institutional differences, potential systemic biases in scoring methodologies, and patient outcomes. Understanding whether these differences are true is important to ensure that performance metrics like MIPS accurately and equitably reflect care quality.

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related ResearchVol. 483(5)
Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic Hospital (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
1.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.