COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THREE PENMAN-MONTEITH VARIANT MODELS FOR GROUNDWATER LEVEL ESTIMATION IN JEJU ISLAND

Accurate estimation of groundwater levels is crucial for effective water resource management, particularly in regions like Jeju Island, where groundwater is the primary water source. This study emphasizes the importance of preprocessing meteorological observations to address the temporal disconnect between rapid meteorological fluctuations and the slower responses of groundwater systems. Key factors such as cumulative effects, delayed reactions, and seasonal variations were considered during preprocessing to improve the reliability of evapotranspiration estimates. Three Penman-Monteith evapotranspiration models (PM, FAO-24, FAO-56) were evaluated using pre-processed data, including accumulated precipitation (100-day), temperature (20-day), and other meteorological parameters. Validation against 2023 groundwater level data demonstrated that the FAO-56 model preprocessing achieved the best performance, with the highest correlation (r = 0.89), lowest mean squared error (MSE = 0.10), and smallest error range (overestimation: +1.1m, underestimation: -1.4m). These results highlight that accurate groundwater level estimation relies on proper preprocessing of observations rather than solely optimizing model operations. The findings provide valuable insights for enhancing groundwater monitoring and sustainable water management in areas with complex geological and hydrological conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26483/ijarcs.v15i6.7154
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THREE PENMAN-MONTEITH VARIANT MODELS FOR GROUNDWATER LEVEL ESTIMATION IN JEJU ISLAND

Jung-Gi An
International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
article

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THREE PENMAN-MONTEITH VARIANT MODELS FOR GROUNDWATER LEVEL ESTIMATION IN JEJU ISLAND

Jung-Gi An
article en

Abstract

Accurate estimation of groundwater levels is crucial for effective water resource management, particularly in regions like Jeju Island, where groundwater is the primary water source. This study emphasizes the importance of preprocessing meteorological observations to address the temporal disconnect between rapid meteorological fluctuations and the slower responses of groundwater systems. Key factors such as cumulative effects, delayed reactions, and seasonal variations were considered during preprocessing to improve the reliability of evapotranspiration estimates. Three Penman-Monteith evapotranspiration models (PM, FAO-24, FAO-56) were evaluated using pre-processed data, including accumulated precipitation (100-day), temperature (20-day), and other meteorological parameters. Validation against 2023 groundwater level data demonstrated that the FAO-56 model preprocessing achieved the best performance, with the highest correlation (r = 0.89), lowest mean squared error (MSE = 0.10), and smallest error range (overestimation: +1.1m, underestimation: -1.4m). These results highlight that accurate groundwater level estimation relies on proper preprocessing of observations rather than solely optimizing model operations. The findings provide valuable insights for enhancing groundwater monitoring and sustainable water management in areas with complex geological and hydrological conditions.

International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer ScienceVol. 15(6)
University of the Ryukyus (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.