Fast and interpretable prediction of seismic kinematics of flexible retaining walls in sand through explainable artificial intelligence

Assessing the response of earth-retaining walls to seismic loading is key for safety. Nonlinear dynamic analyses using the finite element method (FEM) calculate the permanent displacements (PDs) the soil–wall system accumulates during an earthquake, but are computationally intensive. Simplified dynamic displacement-based methods that obtain PDs based on a failure mechanism (FM) and critical acceleration are faster. Still, they require geotechnical expertise, e.g., in strength, failure criteria, and stability under pseudo-static conditions. This paper presents a new method using eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) to predict the FM and k c (critical acceleration as a fraction of gravity) of flexible retaining walls in dry, coarse-grained soil, based on geometry and soil/wall properties. We created a large dataset ( ∼ 1000 samples) via FEM simulations based on plasticity limit theorems, with 7 types of FMs affecting 3 types of walls: propped, cantilever, and anchored. Each sample contained geometrical parameters, soil/wall properties, and FEM-derived FM and k c . Trained on these data, our system has a weighted F1-score of 97.28% and an R 2 above 0.987 for FM and k c predictions, respectively. Shapley explanations (SHAP) and a new coherence model help experts interpret the results and check explanation consistency. Its high accuracy and millisecond-level inference make our method ideal when assessing the seismic response of numerous structures within short timeframes. Also, its interpretability promotes AI-expert collaboration, enhancing decision-making. • Artificial Intelligence : predicts seismic wall failure type and critical acceleration ( k c ). • Extensive Dataset : ∼ 1000 FEM samples covering 7 failure mechanisms for 3 types of wall. • High Precision : 97.28% F1-score and R 2 ¿0.987 for failure and k c predictions. • Fast : Predictions in milliseconds for time-critical seismic risk assessment. • Explainable : predictions promoting trust, expert collaboration, and informed decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Geotechnics
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.107007
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Dam Engineering and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fast and interpretable prediction of seismic kinematics of flexible retaining walls in sand through explainable artificial intelligence

Francesco Pistolesi, Elisabetta Cattoni, Evelina Volpe, Francesco Focacci et al.
8 citations
Computers and Geotechnics
Dam Engineering and Safety
2.09
article

Fast and interpretable prediction of seismic kinematics of flexible retaining walls in sand through explainable artificial intelligence

Francesco Pistolesi, Elisabetta Cattoni, Evelina Volpe, Francesco Focacci, Michele Baldassini
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Assessing the response of earth-retaining walls to seismic loading is key for safety. Nonlinear dynamic analyses using the finite element method (FEM) calculate the permanent displacements (PDs) the soil–wall system accumulates during an earthquake, but are computationally intensive. Simplified dynamic displacement-based methods that obtain PDs based on a failure mechanism (FM) and critical acceleration are faster. Still, they require geotechnical expertise, e.g., in strength, failure criteria, and stability under pseudo-static conditions. This paper presents a new method using eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) to predict the FM and k c (critical acceleration as a fraction of gravity) of flexible retaining walls in dry, coarse-grained soil, based on geometry and soil/wall properties. We created a large dataset ( ∼ 1000 samples) via FEM simulations based on plasticity limit theorems, with 7 types of FMs affecting 3 types of walls: propped, cantilever, and anchored. Each sample contained geometrical parameters, soil/wall properties, and FEM-derived FM and k c . Trained on these data, our system has a weighted F1-score of 97.28% and an R 2 above 0.987 for FM and k c predictions, respectively. Shapley explanations (SHAP) and a new coherence model help experts interpret the results and check explanation consistency. Its high accuracy and millisecond-level inference make our method ideal when assessing the seismic response of numerous structures within short timeframes. Also, its interpretability promotes AI-expert collaboration, enhancing decision-making. • Artificial Intelligence : predicts seismic wall failure type and critical acceleration ( k c ). • Extensive Dataset : ∼ 1000 FEM samples covering 7 failure mechanisms for 3 types of wall. • High Precision : 97.28% F1-score and R 2 ¿0.987 for failure and k c predictions. • Fast : Predictions in milliseconds for time-critical seismic risk assessment. • Explainable : predictions promoting trust, expert collaboration, and informed decisions.

Computers and GeotechnicsVol. 179
University of Pisa (IT), Università degli Studi eCampus (IT)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Dam Engineering and Safety
2.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.