International Journal for Advanced Research in Science & Technology

Real-time stress detection plays a crucial role in optimizing task performance and minimizing risks related to stress in training for hazardous operations.Stress detection systems use physiological signals to train machine learning models to classify the level of stress in unseen data.However, the inter-individual variability and the time-series nature of physiological data pose significant challenges for generalized models, making them less effective for both post-hoc stress detection and real-time monitoring.This study explores a personalized stress detection system that selects individual-specific features for model training.The system was assessed for its performance in real-time scenarios and evaluated post-hoc.Additionally, traditional classifiers were tested for errors arising from indirect approximations, compared against a benchmark optimal probability classifier (Approximate Bayes; A Bayes).Healthy participants completed tasks with varying stress levels (low, medium, high), either in a complex virtual reality task (spaceflight emergency fires, n = 27) or a simple laboratory-based task (N-back, n = 14).Physiological metrics including heart rate, blood pressure, electrodermal activity, and respiration were monitored.Personalized feature selection and window sizes were compared, and classification performance was evaluated using A Bayes, support vector machine, decision tree, and random forest models.Results indicate that a personalized model using time-series intervals can classify stress levels with greater accuracy than generalized models.However, performance varied between traditional classifiers and A Bayes, highlighting errors caused by indirect approximations.The most prevalent feature across the tasks and window sizes was blood pressure.The models that accounted for the differences between subjects presented a significant advantage and were likely to have a more significant role in future stress detection systems.

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48047/ijarst/v14/i12/35
Primary Topic
Internet of Things and AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

International Journal for Advanced Research in Science & Technology

Internet of Things and AI
article

International Journal for Advanced Research in Science & Technology

article en

Abstract

Real-time stress detection plays a crucial role in optimizing task performance and minimizing risks related to stress in training for hazardous operations.Stress detection systems use physiological signals to train machine learning models to classify the level of stress in unseen data.However, the inter-individual variability and the time-series nature of physiological data pose significant challenges for generalized models, making them less effective for both post-hoc stress detection and real-time monitoring.This study explores a personalized stress detection system that selects individual-specific features for model training.The system was assessed for its performance in real-time scenarios and evaluated post-hoc.Additionally, traditional classifiers were tested for errors arising from indirect approximations, compared against a benchmark optimal probability classifier (Approximate Bayes; A Bayes).Healthy participants completed tasks with varying stress levels (low, medium, high), either in a complex virtual reality task (spaceflight emergency fires, n = 27) or a simple laboratory-based task (N-back, n = 14).Physiological metrics including heart rate, blood pressure, electrodermal activity, and respiration were monitored.Personalized feature selection and window sizes were compared, and classification performance was evaluated using A Bayes, support vector machine, decision tree, and random forest models.Results indicate that a personalized model using time-series intervals can classify stress levels with greater accuracy than generalized models.However, performance varied between traditional classifiers and A Bayes, highlighting errors caused by indirect approximations.The most prevalent feature across the tasks and window sizes was blood pressure.The models that accounted for the differences between subjects presented a significant advantage and were likely to have a more significant role in future stress detection systems.

Vol. 14(12)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Internet of Things and AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

International Journal for Advanced Research in Science & Technology · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS