A Reflection on the Current State of Active Learning Research

Interest in active learning continues to grow worldwide. Although the large volume of active learning research has provided a myriad of ways to implement active learning in the classroom, the construct remains underdeveloped and difficult to operationalize because of three main issues in the research literature: (a) the variation in active learning activities in research and in practice; (b) the dichotomy between active learning and lecture; and (c) whether “active” in active learning refers to behavioral activity, cognitive activity, or both. The purpose of this reflection article is to articulate these issues so that active learning can move beyond its current status as a “curious construct.” By discussing avenues for future research that address those issues, our goal is to move the field forward by helping researchers focus on why active learning is effective, which forms of it are the most effective, how it should be implemented to maximize learning, and for whom different active learning interventions are the most effective. Just as active learning is easy to prescribe, it should also be easy to implement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Published
2024-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v24i3.35263
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Problem and Project Based Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Reflection on the Current State of Active Learning Research

Darryl W. Schneider, Amédee Marchand Martella
7 citations
Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Problem and Project Based Learning
12.58
article

A Reflection on the Current State of Active Learning Research

Darryl W. Schneider, Amédee Marchand Martella
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Interest in active learning continues to grow worldwide. Although the large volume of active learning research has provided a myriad of ways to implement active learning in the classroom, the construct remains underdeveloped and difficult to operationalize because of three main issues in the research literature: (a) the variation in active learning activities in research and in practice; (b) the dichotomy between active learning and lecture; and (c) whether “active” in active learning refers to behavioral activity, cognitive activity, or both. The purpose of this reflection article is to articulate these issues so that active learning can move beyond its current status as a “curious construct.” By discussing avenues for future research that address those issues, our goal is to move the field forward by helping researchers focus on why active learning is effective, which forms of it are the most effective, how it should be implemented to maximize learning, and for whom different active learning interventions are the most effective. Just as active learning is easy to prescribe, it should also be easy to implement.

Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and LearningVol. 24(3)
University of California, Santa Barbara (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Problem and Project Based Learning
12.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Reflection on the Current State of Active Learning Research — Darryl W. Schneider, Amédee Marchand Martella · Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS