Assessment of digital culture in sustainable university development systems

The object of this study is the processes of assessing digital culture, the purpose is to devise methodological foundations for assessing digital culture in the systems of sustainable development of universities. The problem of insufficient methodological support for assessing digital culture makes it impossible to effectively manage the sustainable development of the university. The study is based on the example of projects carried out by students at the Lviv Polytechnic National University's course ‘Fundamentals of Entrepreneurship and Business Planning Using IT’, which applies digital technologies based on sustainable development. For the expert evaluation of the digital culture of student projects, a system of indicators has been formed that comprehensively covers it (‘digital security’, ‘digital literacy’, ‘creativity in the digital environment’, ‘use of social networks and communications’, ‘innovation’, ‘digital rights and ethics’). The diversity of the indicators was agreed upon by establishing their significance and using the Saati pairwise comparison method. The substantiation of the digital culture indicators was implemented with the help of a mathematical model based on the matrix approach, using the methods of fuzzy set theory. The calculation of the significance of the digital culture indicators showed that the largest share is accounted for by the indicators ‘digital literacy’ (36 %), ‘digital rights and ethics’ (28 %), ‘digital security’ (16 %), ‘creativity in the digital environment’ (12 %). The lowest is ‘use of social networks and communications’ (4 per cent) and ‘innovation’ (4 per cent). In order to measure the level of digital culture, a pairwise comparison of the projects for each indicator was performed. On the basis of resulting estimates, the corresponding matrices of pairwise comparisons of projects were constructed, for each of which the measures of belonging of elements to a fuzzy set were established. The fuzzy sets were defined, which indicate the degree of certainty in the compliance of student projects with the indicators of digital culture. Based on the results of testing, the student project ‘MyNature’ satisfies the group of indicators of the level of digital culture by 71.2 %, ‘HealthyWay’ – by 53.5 %, ‘!!!Boooya’ – by 48.8 %. The other projects – FizMat:), Medix, and ‘Їііііisty!’ – 36.3 %, 36.4 %, and 42.1 %, respectively

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.317063
Primary Topic
Business and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of digital culture in sustainable university development systems

Вікторія Прохорова, Анна Зайцева, Krystyna Slastianykova, Oleksandra Mrykhina et al.
Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies
Business and Economic Development
article

Assessment of digital culture in sustainable university development systems

Вікторія Прохорова, Анна Зайцева, Krystyna Slastianykova, Oleksandra Mrykhina, Orest Koleshchuk, Тетяна Степура
article en

Abstract

The object of this study is the processes of assessing digital culture, the purpose is to devise methodological foundations for assessing digital culture in the systems of sustainable development of universities. The problem of insufficient methodological support for assessing digital culture makes it impossible to effectively manage the sustainable development of the university. The study is based on the example of projects carried out by students at the Lviv Polytechnic National University's course ‘Fundamentals of Entrepreneurship and Business Planning Using IT’, which applies digital technologies based on sustainable development. For the expert evaluation of the digital culture of student projects, a system of indicators has been formed that comprehensively covers it (‘digital security’, ‘digital literacy’, ‘creativity in the digital environment’, ‘use of social networks and communications’, ‘innovation’, ‘digital rights and ethics’). The diversity of the indicators was agreed upon by establishing their significance and using the Saati pairwise comparison method. The substantiation of the digital culture indicators was implemented with the help of a mathematical model based on the matrix approach, using the methods of fuzzy set theory. The calculation of the significance of the digital culture indicators showed that the largest share is accounted for by the indicators ‘digital literacy’ (36 %), ‘digital rights and ethics’ (28 %), ‘digital security’ (16 %), ‘creativity in the digital environment’ (12 %). The lowest is ‘use of social networks and communications’ (4 per cent) and ‘innovation’ (4 per cent). In order to measure the level of digital culture, a pairwise comparison of the projects for each indicator was performed. On the basis of resulting estimates, the corresponding matrices of pairwise comparisons of projects were constructed, for each of which the measures of belonging of elements to a fuzzy set were established. The fuzzy sets were defined, which indicate the degree of certainty in the compliance of student projects with the indicators of digital culture. Based on the results of testing, the student project ‘MyNature’ satisfies the group of indicators of the level of digital culture by 71.2 %, ‘HealthyWay’ – by 53.5 %, ‘!!!Boooya’ – by 48.8 %. The other projects – FizMat:), Medix, and ‘Їііііisty!’ – 36.3 %, 36.4 %, and 42.1 %, respectively

Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise TechnologiesVol. 6(13 (132))
Ukrainian Engineering Pedagogics Academy (UA), V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University (UA), Lviv Polytechnic National University (UA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Business and Economic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.