Digital Financial Assets as an Object of Civil Rights

This article explores the legal nature of digital financial assets (DFAs) within civil rights. DFAs, including cryptocurrencies and tokens, challenge traditional legal concepts due to their decentralized and intangible nature. The study addresses key legal issues such as ownership rights, enforceability of obligations, and jurisdictional conflicts in cross-border transactions. A comparative analysis of regulatory frameworks in the European Union, the United States, Russia, and Uzbekistan reveals the lack of uniformity in DFA treatment. Special focus is given to Uzbekistan’s progressive approach under the Digital Uzbekistan 2030 initiative. The research adopts a qualitative, doctrinal, and document analysis methodology, supported by case studies and legal analysis. The findings identify significant regulatory gaps, particularly regarding DFA integration into traditional legal systems. The study suggests the need for comprehensive reforms to harmonize DFA regulations and ensure legal clarity. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of aligning legal frameworks with emerging digital financial trends.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Uzbek journal of law and digital policy.
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.245
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Financial Assets as an Object of Civil Rights

Temurbek Pulatov
1 citations
Uzbek journal of law and digital policy.
Digital Transformation in Law
0.83
article

Digital Financial Assets as an Object of Civil Rights

Temurbek Pulatov
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article explores the legal nature of digital financial assets (DFAs) within civil rights. DFAs, including cryptocurrencies and tokens, challenge traditional legal concepts due to their decentralized and intangible nature. The study addresses key legal issues such as ownership rights, enforceability of obligations, and jurisdictional conflicts in cross-border transactions. A comparative analysis of regulatory frameworks in the European Union, the United States, Russia, and Uzbekistan reveals the lack of uniformity in DFA treatment. Special focus is given to Uzbekistan’s progressive approach under the Digital Uzbekistan 2030 initiative. The research adopts a qualitative, doctrinal, and document analysis methodology, supported by case studies and legal analysis. The findings identify significant regulatory gaps, particularly regarding DFA integration into traditional legal systems. The study suggests the need for comprehensive reforms to harmonize DFA regulations and ensure legal clarity. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of aligning legal frameworks with emerging digital financial trends.

Uzbek journal of law and digital policy.Vol. 2(6)
Tashkent State University of Law (UZ)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Digital Transformation in Law
0.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Digital Financial Assets as an Object of Civil Rights — Temurbek Pulatov · Uzbek journal of law and digital policy. (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS