Legal Frameworks for AI-Driven Cybercrime Prevention

This research aims to explore the legal frameworks necessary for integrating AI-driven evidence in cybercrime prevention while ensuring the protection of privacy rights. The study examines AI's role in evidence collection, particularly focusing on the challenges of AI surveillance capabilities and the privacy concerns surrounding data gathering. Using qualitative, doctrinal, and document analysis methods, the research analyzes how different jurisdictions address the admissibility of AI evidence in criminal proceedings. The findings highlight the challenges posed by AI's opacity, the black box problem, and the reliability of AI-generated evidence. The recommendations include conducting risk assessments, limiting data collection, ensuring informed consent, and enhancing security practices. The research suggests developing international protocols for cross-border enforcement systems to address the evolving nature of cybercrime. In conclusion, this study provides insights into adapting legal standards for AI-driven cybercrime prevention while safeguarding individual privacy rights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Uzbek journal of law and digital policy.
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.253
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Frameworks for AI-Driven Cybercrime Prevention

Naeem AllahRakha
Uzbek journal of law and digital policy.
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Legal Frameworks for AI-Driven Cybercrime Prevention

Naeem AllahRakha
article en

Abstract

This research aims to explore the legal frameworks necessary for integrating AI-driven evidence in cybercrime prevention while ensuring the protection of privacy rights. The study examines AI's role in evidence collection, particularly focusing on the challenges of AI surveillance capabilities and the privacy concerns surrounding data gathering. Using qualitative, doctrinal, and document analysis methods, the research analyzes how different jurisdictions address the admissibility of AI evidence in criminal proceedings. The findings highlight the challenges posed by AI's opacity, the black box problem, and the reliability of AI-generated evidence. The recommendations include conducting risk assessments, limiting data collection, ensuring informed consent, and enhancing security practices. The research suggests developing international protocols for cross-border enforcement systems to address the evolving nature of cybercrime. In conclusion, this study provides insights into adapting legal standards for AI-driven cybercrime prevention while safeguarding individual privacy rights.

Uzbek journal of law and digital policy.Vol. 2(6)
Tashkent State University of Law (UZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.