GDPR vs. Weakly Protected Parties in Other Countries

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) establishes strong privacy rights for EU residents. However, many countries, including the United States, Asia, and Africa, lack similar protections. This creates challenges for multinational corporations and individuals navigating fragmented global data protection frameworks. This study examines the evolution, principles, and extraterritorial effects of GDPR, comparing it with weaker regulatory frameworks globally. Using qualitative and doctrinal research and document analysis, it identifies enforcement gaps, compliance costs, and operational difficulties in cross-border data transfers. Findings emphasize the need for consistent global standards to address the digital divide and ensure fair data practices. Recommendations highlight multilateral cooperation to develop an interoperable and ethical digital ecosystem. While GDPR offers a foundational model, achieving global harmonization requires collective international commitment. The study concludes with actionable suggestions to strengthen global privacy frameworks and protect vulnerable parties in weakly regulated regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Uzbek journal of law and digital policy.
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.254
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GDPR vs. Weakly Protected Parties in Other Countries

Gayrat Eshbaev
1 citations
Uzbek journal of law and digital policy.
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
1.13
article

GDPR vs. Weakly Protected Parties in Other Countries

Gayrat Eshbaev
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) establishes strong privacy rights for EU residents. However, many countries, including the United States, Asia, and Africa, lack similar protections. This creates challenges for multinational corporations and individuals navigating fragmented global data protection frameworks. This study examines the evolution, principles, and extraterritorial effects of GDPR, comparing it with weaker regulatory frameworks globally. Using qualitative and doctrinal research and document analysis, it identifies enforcement gaps, compliance costs, and operational difficulties in cross-border data transfers. Findings emphasize the need for consistent global standards to address the digital divide and ensure fair data practices. Recommendations highlight multilateral cooperation to develop an interoperable and ethical digital ecosystem. While GDPR offers a foundational model, achieving global harmonization requires collective international commitment. The study concludes with actionable suggestions to strengthen global privacy frameworks and protect vulnerable parties in weakly regulated regions.

Uzbek journal of law and digital policy.Vol. 2(6)
Tashkent State University of Law (UZ)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

GDPR vs. Weakly Protected Parties in Other Countries — Gayrat Eshbaev · Uzbek journal of law and digital policy. (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS