Evaluating Once a Week Maxillary Advancements Using a Distraction Device

Introduction: Maxillary distraction is often used to correct significant molar Class III malocclusion. We have introduced a modification of the traditional distraction schedule utilizing larger interval distractions once a week under sedation. We hypothesize that this new schedule still allows for successful advancement with limited relapse of the LeFort segment. The underlying principle is that the greatest benefit of maxillary advancement is utilizing the LeFort I segment to expand the soft tissues of the palate and midface. Methods: The modified advancement schedule consisted of the placement of internal distraction devices following a LeFort I osteotomy with an initial advancement of 5 to 8 mm. Thereafter, the patient underwent weekly “interval” advancements under sedation in the operating room. Cephalograms were taken preoperatively, perioperatively, and 6 months after distraction device removal. The cephalometric landmarks were analyzed including SNA and ANB angles as an indicator of maxillary positioning. Results: From June 2021 to September 2023, 13 consecutive patients underwent maxillary advancement with the new interval advancement schedule. Nine patients were found to have all 3 data points required for inclusion in this study. The total distance of advancement averaged 17.2 (±2.9) mm. Patients had an average of 2.7 (±0.7) advancement events. Advancement on the day of surgery averaged 6.7 (±0.8) mm and during each interval advancement event averaged 6.1 (±1.0), 5.2 (±1.6), and 0.5 (±0.5) mm. Conclusion: Modifying the schedule of maxillary distraction from twice daily advancements during the activation phase to weekly advancements with larger interval movements grants acceptable advancement with limited relapse. This new approach to maxillary advancement utilizes both the principles of distraction osteogenesis and soft tissue expansion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FACE
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/27325016241304617
Primary Topic
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Once a Week Maxillary Advancements Using a Distraction Device

Stefanie E. Hush, Danielle L. Sobol, Courtney Swan, Colin M. Brady et al.
FACE
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
article

Evaluating Once a Week Maxillary Advancements Using a Distraction Device

Stefanie E. Hush, Danielle L. Sobol, Courtney Swan, Colin M. Brady, Joseph K. Williams, Magda Soldanska
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Maxillary distraction is often used to correct significant molar Class III malocclusion. We have introduced a modification of the traditional distraction schedule utilizing larger interval distractions once a week under sedation. We hypothesize that this new schedule still allows for successful advancement with limited relapse of the LeFort segment. The underlying principle is that the greatest benefit of maxillary advancement is utilizing the LeFort I segment to expand the soft tissues of the palate and midface. Methods: The modified advancement schedule consisted of the placement of internal distraction devices following a LeFort I osteotomy with an initial advancement of 5 to 8 mm. Thereafter, the patient underwent weekly “interval” advancements under sedation in the operating room. Cephalograms were taken preoperatively, perioperatively, and 6 months after distraction device removal. The cephalometric landmarks were analyzed including SNA and ANB angles as an indicator of maxillary positioning. Results: From June 2021 to September 2023, 13 consecutive patients underwent maxillary advancement with the new interval advancement schedule. Nine patients were found to have all 3 data points required for inclusion in this study. The total distance of advancement averaged 17.2 (±2.9) mm. Patients had an average of 2.7 (±0.7) advancement events. Advancement on the day of surgery averaged 6.7 (±0.8) mm and during each interval advancement event averaged 6.1 (±1.0), 5.2 (±1.6), and 0.5 (±0.5) mm. Conclusion: Modifying the schedule of maxillary distraction from twice daily advancements during the activation phase to weekly advancements with larger interval movements grants acceptable advancement with limited relapse. This new approach to maxillary advancement utilizes both the principles of distraction osteogenesis and soft tissue expansion.

FACEVol. 6(1)
Emory University (US), Children's Healthcare of Atlanta (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.