Integrative Modeling in the Age of Machine Learning: A Summary of <scp>HADDOCK</scp> Strategies in <scp>CAPRI</scp> Rounds 47–55

The HADDOCK team participated in CAPRI rounds 47-55 as server, manual predictor, and scorers. Throughout these CAPRI rounds, we used a plethora of computational strategies to predict the structure of protein complexes. Of the 10 targets comprising 24 interfaces, we achieved acceptable or better models for 3 targets in the human category and 1 in the server category. Our performance in the scoring challenge was slightly better, with our simple scoring protocol being the only one capable of identifying an acceptable model for Target 234. This result highlights the robustness of the simple, fully physics-based HADDOCK scoring function, especially when applied to highly flexible antibody-antigen complexes. Inspired by the significant advances in machine learning for structural biology and the dramatic improvement in our success rates after the public release of Alphafold2, we identify the integration of classical approaches like HADDOCK with AI-driven structure prediction methods as a key strategy for improving the accuracy of model generation and scoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.26789
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrative Modeling in the Age of Machine Learning: A Summary of HADDOCK Strategies in CAPRI Rounds 47–55

Manon Réau, Anna Engel, Brian Jiménez‐García, Zuzana Jandová et al.
3 citations
Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
1.21
article

Integrative Modeling in the Age of Machine Learning: A Summary of HADDOCK Strategies in CAPRI Rounds 47–55

Manon Réau, Anna Engel, Brian Jiménez‐García, Zuzana Jandová, Panagiotis I. Koukos, Marco Giulini, João M. C. Teixeira, Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin, Cunliang Geng, Vlad Cojocaru, Victor Reys, Rodrigo V. Honorato, Francesco Ambrosetti, Siri C. van Keulen, Jorge Roel‐Touris, Charlotte van Noort, Xiaotong Xu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The HADDOCK team participated in CAPRI rounds 47-55 as server, manual predictor, and scorers. Throughout these CAPRI rounds, we used a plethora of computational strategies to predict the structure of protein complexes. Of the 10 targets comprising 24 interfaces, we achieved acceptable or better models for 3 targets in the human category and 1 in the server category. Our performance in the scoring challenge was slightly better, with our simple scoring protocol being the only one capable of identifying an acceptable model for Target 234. This result highlights the robustness of the simple, fully physics-based HADDOCK scoring function, especially when applied to highly flexible antibody-antigen complexes. Inspired by the significant advances in machine learning for structural biology and the dramatic improvement in our success rates after the public release of Alphafold2, we identify the integration of classical approaches like HADDOCK with AI-driven structure prediction methods as a key strategy for improving the accuracy of model generation and scoring.

Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
Novartis (Switzerland) (CH), Utrecht University (NL), Academy of Athens (GR), Babeș-Bolyai University (RO), Boehringer Ingelheim (Austria) (AT), Institut de Biologia Molecular de Barcelona (ES)
Netherlands eScience Center, European Commission, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
1.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.