Dynamically triggered seismicity in Japan following the 2024 Mw7.5 Noto earthquake

Abstract On January 1st, 2024, a moment magnitude ( M w ) 7.5 earthquake occurred on an active reverse fault in the northern part of Noto Peninsula, being one of the largest intraplate events recorded in Japan. In previous studies, the dynamic triggering of seismicity in Japan following some large remote earthquakes has been well documented, such as in the case of the 2011 M w 9.0 Tohoku–Oki earthquake, the 2016 M w 7.1 Kumamoto earthquake, and other large teleseismic events. In this study, we investigate the remote triggering of microearthquakes by the 2024 Noto earthquake and their characteristics. We analyze waveform data recorded at high-sensitivity seismic stations in Japan, before and after the occurrence of the Noto mainshock. Local earthquakes are detected on high-pass filtered three-component seismograms. Low-pass filtered waveforms are used for visualizing the mainshock surface waves and estimating dynamic stresses. Our results show a relatively widespread activation of small earthquakes—none of them listed in the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) earthquake catalog—that were triggered by the passage of the mainshock surface waves in many regions of Japan. These include Hokkaido and Tohoku in northeastern Japan, Kanto in central Japan, and Kyushu in southern Japan. The triggering is mostly observed in volcanic regions, supporting the hypothesis that such places are relatively easy to be activated dynamically, likely due to the excitation of fluids by the passage of mainshock surface waves. The calculated dynamic stress changes estimated from peak ground velocities, which triggered the earthquakes after the Noto mainshock, are in the range 12.8–102.6 kPa. We also report potential, less well-constrained dynamic triggering by the M w 5.3 Noto foreshock, which occurred ~ 4 min before the mainshock, at levels of stress about 100 times smaller. The analysis of a longer-term (1 month) seismicity pattern, based on the JMA catalog, revealed a statistically significant increase of seismicity in the remote Akita–Yakeyama (Tohoku region) volcanic area, following the Noto earthquake. Graphical Abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth Planets and Space
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-024-02127-z
Citations
4
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.14

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamically triggered seismicity in Japan following the 2024 Mw7.5 Noto earthquake

Héctor González‐Huízar, Bogdan Enescu, Yoshihiro Ito, Zhigang Peng et al.
4 citations
Earth Planets and Space
earthquake and tectonic studies
2.14
article

Dynamically triggered seismicity in Japan following the 2024 Mw7.5 Noto earthquake

Héctor González‐Huízar, Bogdan Enescu, Yoshihiro Ito, Zhigang Peng, Like An, Masatoshi Miyazawa
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract On January 1st, 2024, a moment magnitude ( M w ) 7.5 earthquake occurred on an active reverse fault in the northern part of Noto Peninsula, being one of the largest intraplate events recorded in Japan. In previous studies, the dynamic triggering of seismicity in Japan following some large remote earthquakes has been well documented, such as in the case of the 2011 M w 9.0 Tohoku–Oki earthquake, the 2016 M w 7.1 Kumamoto earthquake, and other large teleseismic events. In this study, we investigate the remote triggering of microearthquakes by the 2024 Noto earthquake and their characteristics. We analyze waveform data recorded at high-sensitivity seismic stations in Japan, before and after the occurrence of the Noto mainshock. Local earthquakes are detected on high-pass filtered three-component seismograms. Low-pass filtered waveforms are used for visualizing the mainshock surface waves and estimating dynamic stresses. Our results show a relatively widespread activation of small earthquakes—none of them listed in the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) earthquake catalog—that were triggered by the passage of the mainshock surface waves in many regions of Japan. These include Hokkaido and Tohoku in northeastern Japan, Kanto in central Japan, and Kyushu in southern Japan. The triggering is mostly observed in volcanic regions, supporting the hypothesis that such places are relatively easy to be activated dynamically, likely due to the excitation of fluids by the passage of mainshock surface waves. The calculated dynamic stress changes estimated from peak ground velocities, which triggered the earthquakes after the Noto mainshock, are in the range 12.8–102.6 kPa. We also report potential, less well-constrained dynamic triggering by the M w 5.3 Noto foreshock, which occurred ~ 4 min before the mainshock, at levels of stress about 100 times smaller. The analysis of a longer-term (1 month) seismicity pattern, based on the JMA catalog, revealed a statistically significant increase of seismicity in the remote Akita–Yakeyama (Tohoku region) volcanic area, following the Noto earthquake. Graphical Abstract

Earth Planets and SpaceVol. 76(1)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Kyoto University (JP), Institutul National de Cercetare si Dezvoltare pentru Fizica Pamantului (RO), Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada (MX)
National Science Foundation, Ministerul Cercetării, Inovării şi Digitalizării, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science London, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Japan Science and Technology Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
earthquake and tectonic studies
2.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.