AI-Related Disciplines: A Comparative Analysis of Regional Trade Agreements and National Regulatory Approaches

The global digital economy is witnessing the transformative impact of Artificial intelligence (AI), prompting nations to engage in AI-driven trade agreements. Under the digital trade context, these agreements aim to promote and regulate AI technologies, facilitate international AI cooperation, and touch upon data-related disciplines crucial for AI. This article delves into analysing the emerging trend in specific AI disciplines and other AI-related fields, including data provisions in regional trade agreements (RTAs). It also maps out the current landscape of AI regulatory approaches in the United States (US), the European Union (EU), China, and Singapore to analyse how these diverse domestic regulatory approaches may impact regional AI rulemaking. Findings reveal that RTAs emphasize on AI recognition, AI frameworks, and AI cooperation, albeit in a flexible and soft manner. Besides, while the US’s market-driven approach could spearhead rulemaking in AI, its recent policy shifts cast doubt on its comprehensive participation in RTAs. The EU is at the forefront of domestic AI legislation, and seeks to mirror the risk and security-based value at the regional level. China, driven by its massive market potential and concerns about data security, relies on a hybrid approach that explores regulatory strategies alongside AI development. Singapore is notable for taking proactive steps in addressing AI governance through RTAs, which demonstrates a unique form of Asian regionalism. Despite the fragmented approaches among major economies, this article emphasizes on the role of RTAs in addressing trade-related AI issues and puts forward recommendations for AIspecific rulemaking in RTAs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of World Trade
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2025002
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-Related Disciplines: A Comparative Analysis of Regional Trade Agreements and National Regulatory Approaches

Siqi Li
3 citations
Journal of World Trade
Global trade and economics
2.49
article

AI-Related Disciplines: A Comparative Analysis of Regional Trade Agreements and National Regulatory Approaches

Siqi Li
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The global digital economy is witnessing the transformative impact of Artificial intelligence (AI), prompting nations to engage in AI-driven trade agreements. Under the digital trade context, these agreements aim to promote and regulate AI technologies, facilitate international AI cooperation, and touch upon data-related disciplines crucial for AI. This article delves into analysing the emerging trend in specific AI disciplines and other AI-related fields, including data provisions in regional trade agreements (RTAs). It also maps out the current landscape of AI regulatory approaches in the United States (US), the European Union (EU), China, and Singapore to analyse how these diverse domestic regulatory approaches may impact regional AI rulemaking. Findings reveal that RTAs emphasize on AI recognition, AI frameworks, and AI cooperation, albeit in a flexible and soft manner. Besides, while the US’s market-driven approach could spearhead rulemaking in AI, its recent policy shifts cast doubt on its comprehensive participation in RTAs. The EU is at the forefront of domestic AI legislation, and seeks to mirror the risk and security-based value at the regional level. China, driven by its massive market potential and concerns about data security, relies on a hybrid approach that explores regulatory strategies alongside AI development. Singapore is notable for taking proactive steps in addressing AI governance through RTAs, which demonstrates a unique form of Asian regionalism. Despite the fragmented approaches among major economies, this article emphasizes on the role of RTAs in addressing trade-related AI issues and puts forward recommendations for AIspecific rulemaking in RTAs.

Journal of World TradeVol. 59(Issue 1)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Global trade and economics
2.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.