A Comparative Study of Two Anesthetic Agents Thiopentone Sodium and Propofol in Modified Electroconvulsive Therapy

Abstract Objectives: Modified electroconvulsive therapy (MECT) remains one of the effective treatment modalities for various psychiatric illnesses. There are various anesthetic agents used in MECT. Thiopentone sodium and propofol are the most commonly used induction agents but differences exist among these two agents. In this study, we intended to compare thiopentone sodium and propofol in seizure duration, recovery time, hemodynamic, and cognitive profiles in patients receiving MECT. Methods: This was a comparative study done in Narayana Medical College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India. We recruited 80 study patients who were diagnosed with severe depression with suicidal ideations and schizophrenia with positive symptoms and were planned for receiving MECT. The study patients received assessments using Hamilton Rating Scale for depression (HAM-D), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, and Brief Cognitive Rating Scale (BCRS) at the time of admission, after the first, and the last post-MECT sessions. Results: The difference of the mean seizure duration between in thiopentone sodium and propofol (28.3 vs. 20.9 s) was statistically significant ( p < 0.01). There were significant changes in baseline parameters after the procedure. The difference in the mean value of the recovery period between the thiopentone sodium and propofol group, i.e., (467.0 ± 72.2 vs. 311.5 ± 58.6 s) was also significant ( p < 01). The mean BCRS scores after 1st and last sessions in the thiopentone sodium group were 9.2 and 11.6, respectively, whereas those in the propofol group were 8.0 and 10.0, respectively. The mean BCRS scores between the first and the last post-MECT were significantly different in the thiopentone sodium group ( p < 0.01) and the propoful group ( p < 0.01). The mean BCRS scores were significantly different at the first post-MECT ( p < 0.05) and the last post-MECT ( p < 0.05) between two anesthetic groups. Conclusion: The study showed that propofol was a better anesthetic agent than thiopentone sodium as propofol had faster recovery time with stable hemodynamic parameters, and less cognitive deficits, but had shorter seizure duration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Taiwanese Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/tpsy.tpsy_33_24
Primary Topic
Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of Two Anesthetic Agents Thiopentone Sodium and Propofol in Modified Electroconvulsive Therapy

V. Harshitha, E. Ananda Reddy, Velama Pooja Prasanna, Sanagapalli S. V. L. Manasa et al.
Taiwanese Journal of Psychiatry
Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
article

A Comparative Study of Two Anesthetic Agents Thiopentone Sodium and Propofol in Modified Electroconvulsive Therapy

V. Harshitha, E. Ananda Reddy, Velama Pooja Prasanna, Sanagapalli S. V. L. Manasa, Javangula Swetha Krishna, Chennuru Kavya Lekha
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objectives: Modified electroconvulsive therapy (MECT) remains one of the effective treatment modalities for various psychiatric illnesses. There are various anesthetic agents used in MECT. Thiopentone sodium and propofol are the most commonly used induction agents but differences exist among these two agents. In this study, we intended to compare thiopentone sodium and propofol in seizure duration, recovery time, hemodynamic, and cognitive profiles in patients receiving MECT. Methods: This was a comparative study done in Narayana Medical College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India. We recruited 80 study patients who were diagnosed with severe depression with suicidal ideations and schizophrenia with positive symptoms and were planned for receiving MECT. The study patients received assessments using Hamilton Rating Scale for depression (HAM-D), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, and Brief Cognitive Rating Scale (BCRS) at the time of admission, after the first, and the last post-MECT sessions. Results: The difference of the mean seizure duration between in thiopentone sodium and propofol (28.3 vs. 20.9 s) was statistically significant ( p < 0.01). There were significant changes in baseline parameters after the procedure. The difference in the mean value of the recovery period between the thiopentone sodium and propofol group, i.e., (467.0 ± 72.2 vs. 311.5 ± 58.6 s) was also significant ( p < 01). The mean BCRS scores after 1st and last sessions in the thiopentone sodium group were 9.2 and 11.6, respectively, whereas those in the propofol group were 8.0 and 10.0, respectively. The mean BCRS scores between the first and the last post-MECT were significantly different in the thiopentone sodium group ( p < 0.01) and the propoful group ( p < 0.01). The mean BCRS scores were significantly different at the first post-MECT ( p < 0.05) and the last post-MECT ( p < 0.05) between two anesthetic groups. Conclusion: The study showed that propofol was a better anesthetic agent than thiopentone sodium as propofol had faster recovery time with stable hemodynamic parameters, and less cognitive deficits, but had shorter seizure duration.

Taiwanese Journal of PsychiatryVol. 38(4)
Narayana Dental College and Hospital (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.