Cross-validation Optimal Fold-Number for Model Selection

The resampling method of k-fold cross-validation is popular for error estimation and model selection in computational research. However, there is limited focus in the literature on the question of what fold number k is appropriate for various dataset dimensions. Here we review relevant literature and present a simulation of linear and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression prediction error estimation at various values of k and sample size n. In agreement with current literature, we find that contrary to a persisting understanding, there is no bias-variance trade-off in selection of k. Instead, with increasing k both bias and variance decrease, perhaps asymptotically. Our results also suggest a predictable relationship between optimal values of k and n. KEYWORDS: Cross-validation; Optimization; Fold number

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Undergraduate Research
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33697/ajur.2024.123
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fault Detection and Control Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-validation Optimal Fold-Number for Model Selection

G. A. Matthews, Angelos Vasilopoulos
2 citations
American Journal of Undergraduate Research
Fault Detection and Control Systems
0.66
article

Cross-validation Optimal Fold-Number for Model Selection

G. A. Matthews, Angelos Vasilopoulos
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The resampling method of k-fold cross-validation is popular for error estimation and model selection in computational research. However, there is limited focus in the literature on the question of what fold number k is appropriate for various dataset dimensions. Here we review relevant literature and present a simulation of linear and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression prediction error estimation at various values of k and sample size n. In agreement with current literature, we find that contrary to a persisting understanding, there is no bias-variance trade-off in selection of k. Instead, with increasing k both bias and variance decrease, perhaps asymptotically. Our results also suggest a predictable relationship between optimal values of k and n. KEYWORDS: Cross-validation; Optimization; Fold number

American Journal of Undergraduate ResearchVol. 21(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Fault Detection and Control Systems
0.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.