Investigating hip muscles function in subtrochanteric fracture stabilized with dynamic condyle screw versus proximal femoral nail anti-rotation

Weakness of the abductor muscles in subtrochanteric fractures is often overlooked, leading to decreased patient function. The aim of this study was to compare the results of abductor muscles function in subtrochanteric fracture stabilized with dynamic condyle screw (DCS) versus proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA). In a retrospective cohort study, 103 patients aged 20–60 years with subtrochanteric fractures who were admitted to the hospital from December 2018 to December 2021, were divided into two groups: PFNA (56 patients) and DCS (47 patients). Patients were evaluated and compared at three months and six months after the surgery in terms of Harris hip score (HHS), Modified McKay criteria (MMc), pain score (VAS), Muscular power test and Trendelenburg test. The mean HHS between the two groups (PFNA vs DCS) was (80.17±7.11 vs 76.17±8.12) at the first follow-up and (84.39±7.85 vs 83.97±12.5) at the second follow-up, respectively. Despite the higher HHS score in the PFNA group at three and six months, this difference was not significant (P 1 = 0.72, P 2 = 0.731). MMc has been improved at the second follow-up with a higher number of patients in Excellent and lower numbers in Fair and Poor. However, statistics showed no significant difference between the groups at two follow-ups. There was not any statistically significant difference between the patients in the two groups in terms of pain scores in follow-ups (P 1 = 0.443, P 2 = 0.948). Muscle power grade had no significant difference between the groups. Also, the decrease in Trendelenburg test (normal to severe) in the third month in the PFNA group was less than in the DCS group (P 1 = 0.031), but there was no significant difference between the groups after 6 months (P 2 = 0.595). According to our study, regardless of the type of fixation device, they had good functional and clinical results during six months. Therefore, following up patients in regular periods after surgery and paying attention to the clinical function of the abductor muscles is important, which can be improved by targeted physiotherapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Reports
Published
2024-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorep.2024.100535
Primary Topic
Hip and Femur Fractures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating hip muscles function in subtrochanteric fracture stabilized with dynamic condyle screw versus proximal femoral nail anti-rotation

Sona Bonakdar, Morteza Gholipour, Amirhossein Salmannezhad, Fatemeh Abbası et al.
Journal of Orthopaedic Reports
Hip and Femur Fractures
article

Investigating hip muscles function in subtrochanteric fracture stabilized with dynamic condyle screw versus proximal femoral nail anti-rotation

Sona Bonakdar, Morteza Gholipour, Amirhossein Salmannezhad, Fatemeh Abbası, Seyed Mehdi Hosseini Khameneh, Amin Alizadeh
article en

Abstract

Weakness of the abductor muscles in subtrochanteric fractures is often overlooked, leading to decreased patient function. The aim of this study was to compare the results of abductor muscles function in subtrochanteric fracture stabilized with dynamic condyle screw (DCS) versus proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA). In a retrospective cohort study, 103 patients aged 20–60 years with subtrochanteric fractures who were admitted to the hospital from December 2018 to December 2021, were divided into two groups: PFNA (56 patients) and DCS (47 patients). Patients were evaluated and compared at three months and six months after the surgery in terms of Harris hip score (HHS), Modified McKay criteria (MMc), pain score (VAS), Muscular power test and Trendelenburg test. The mean HHS between the two groups (PFNA vs DCS) was (80.17±7.11 vs 76.17±8.12) at the first follow-up and (84.39±7.85 vs 83.97±12.5) at the second follow-up, respectively. Despite the higher HHS score in the PFNA group at three and six months, this difference was not significant (P 1 = 0.72, P 2 = 0.731). MMc has been improved at the second follow-up with a higher number of patients in Excellent and lower numbers in Fair and Poor. However, statistics showed no significant difference between the groups at two follow-ups. There was not any statistically significant difference between the patients in the two groups in terms of pain scores in follow-ups (P 1 = 0.443, P 2 = 0.948). Muscle power grade had no significant difference between the groups. Also, the decrease in Trendelenburg test (normal to severe) in the third month in the PFNA group was less than in the DCS group (P 1 = 0.031), but there was no significant difference between the groups after 6 months (P 2 = 0.595). According to our study, regardless of the type of fixation device, they had good functional and clinical results during six months. Therefore, following up patients in regular periods after surgery and paying attention to the clinical function of the abductor muscles is important, which can be improved by targeted physiotherapy.

Journal of Orthopaedic ReportsVol. 4(1)
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Hip and Femur Fractures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.