Optimalisasi Peran Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban Dalam Memfasilitasi Pemberian Kompensasi Terhadap Korban Terorisme

This research aims to examine the role of the Witness and Victim Protection Agency (LPSK) as a facilitator in providing compensation for victims of terrorism and to analyze the implementation of compensation for victims of terrorism. This research is motivated by the fact that LPSK has not been optimal in exercising its authority as a facilitator in providing compensation to victims of terrorism. The research method used is normative juridical through statute approach, namely Terrorism Law and Victim Witness Protection Law and conceptual approach. The novelty in this research is to complement the studies conducted in previous studies that analyzed using Law Number 5 of 2018 concerning Eradication of the Crime of Theorism, in this study comparing the Terrorism Law with Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning Witness and Victim Protection. As well as examining the provision of compensation to Victims of Past Terrorism (KTML). Based on the results of the research, it is concluded that LPSK has not been optimal in exercising its authority as a facilitator of compensation for victims of terrorism. However, LPSK has a breakthrough mechanism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bacarita Law Journal
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30598/bacarita.v5i1.12973
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimalisasi Peran Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban Dalam Memfasilitasi Pemberian Kompensasi Terhadap Korban Terorisme

Adinda Kusumanig Ratri, Slamet Tri Wahyudi
Bacarita Law Journal
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
article

Optimalisasi Peran Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban Dalam Memfasilitasi Pemberian Kompensasi Terhadap Korban Terorisme

Adinda Kusumanig Ratri, Slamet Tri Wahyudi
article en

Abstract

This research aims to examine the role of the Witness and Victim Protection Agency (LPSK) as a facilitator in providing compensation for victims of terrorism and to analyze the implementation of compensation for victims of terrorism. This research is motivated by the fact that LPSK has not been optimal in exercising its authority as a facilitator in providing compensation to victims of terrorism. The research method used is normative juridical through statute approach, namely Terrorism Law and Victim Witness Protection Law and conceptual approach. The novelty in this research is to complement the studies conducted in previous studies that analyzed using Law Number 5 of 2018 concerning Eradication of the Crime of Theorism, in this study comparing the Terrorism Law with Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning Witness and Victim Protection. As well as examining the provision of compensation to Victims of Past Terrorism (KTML). Based on the results of the research, it is concluded that LPSK has not been optimal in exercising its authority as a facilitator of compensation for victims of terrorism. However, LPSK has a breakthrough mechanism.

Bacarita Law JournalVol. 5(1)
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Optimalisasi Peran Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban Dalam Memfasilitasi Pemberian Kompensasi Terhadap Korban Terorisme — Adinda Kusumanig Ratri, Slamet Tri Wahyudi · Bacarita Law Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS