Interfacial Challenges of Halide‐Based All‐Solid‐State Batteries

Abstract As the demand for high energy density and battery safety grows, all‐solid‐state batteries (ASSBs) have garnered considerable attention as promising energy storage systems by removing flammable liquid electrolytes (LEs). Cutting‐edge sulfide inorganic solid electrolytes (ISEs) such as Li 10 GeP 2 S 12 and Li 6 PS 5 Cl have shown high Li + conductivity comparable to those of LEs. However, the narrow electrochemical stability windows of sulfide ISEs hinder the development of high‐energy density ASSBs with severe interfacial challenges. Recently, halide ISEs such as Li 3 YCl 6 and Li 3 InCl 6 are attracting increasing attention because of their high Li + ion conductivity, excellent thermal stability, and high oxidative stability above 4 V. These properties are crucial to developing ASSBs with high energy density, and exceptional cycle and rate performances when employing high‐voltage cathode materials. Nevertheless, recent studies have identified severe interfacial challenges in ASSBs utilizing halide ISEs. Moreover, the safety of ASSBs is assumed to be better than conventional LE batteries but studies find the opposite conclusion when certain types of ISEs are employed, which can be attributed to products from side reactions at the interfaces. The objective here is to summarize the interfacial challenges associated with halide ISEs‐based ASSBs that will guide the development of high‐performance and safe ASSBs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Energy Materials
Published
2024-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202403986
Citations
29
Primary Topic
Advancements in Battery Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interfacial Challenges of Halide‐Based All‐Solid‐State Batteries

Kyeongjae Cho, Junghyun Choi, Jiaqi Ke, Yue Zhou et al.
29 citations
Advanced Energy Materials
Advancements in Battery Materials
6.05
article

Interfacial Challenges of Halide‐Based All‐Solid‐State Batteries

Kyeongjae Cho, Junghyun Choi, Jiaqi Ke, Yue Zhou, Laisuo Su, Marcela R. Beltrán, Yuanqiang Tan, Dongsoo Lee, Jiayi Zhang
article en
29 citations

Abstract

Abstract As the demand for high energy density and battery safety grows, all‐solid‐state batteries (ASSBs) have garnered considerable attention as promising energy storage systems by removing flammable liquid electrolytes (LEs). Cutting‐edge sulfide inorganic solid electrolytes (ISEs) such as Li 10 GeP 2 S 12 and Li 6 PS 5 Cl have shown high Li + conductivity comparable to those of LEs. However, the narrow electrochemical stability windows of sulfide ISEs hinder the development of high‐energy density ASSBs with severe interfacial challenges. Recently, halide ISEs such as Li 3 YCl 6 and Li 3 InCl 6 are attracting increasing attention because of their high Li + ion conductivity, excellent thermal stability, and high oxidative stability above 4 V. These properties are crucial to developing ASSBs with high energy density, and exceptional cycle and rate performances when employing high‐voltage cathode materials. Nevertheless, recent studies have identified severe interfacial challenges in ASSBs utilizing halide ISEs. Moreover, the safety of ASSBs is assumed to be better than conventional LE batteries but studies find the opposite conclusion when certain types of ISEs are employed, which can be attributed to products from side reactions at the interfaces. The objective here is to summarize the interfacial challenges associated with halide ISEs‐based ASSBs that will guide the development of high‐performance and safe ASSBs.

Advanced Energy MaterialsVol. 15(13)
Gachon University (KR), The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
U.S. Department of Defense, Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, National Research Foundation of Korea, University of Texas at Dallas
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Advancements in Battery Materials
6.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.