Evaluation of CNG engine conversion to hydrogen fuel for stationary and transient operations

This study investigates the use of hydrogen (H 2 ) as a substitute for compressed natural gas (CNG) in a heavy-duty (HD) six-cylinder engine, focusing on both port fuel injection (PFI) and direct injection (DI) systems. Numerical modeling in a 0D/1D environment was employed, simulating engine operation under stationary conditions and during the worldwide harmonized transient cycle (WHTC) and worldwide harmonized vehicle cycle (WHVC) homologation cycles. Results indicated a reduction in torque (7% for direct injection and 21.5% for port fuel injection) and power (32% for direct injection and 35.5% for port fuel injection) when switching from CNG to H 2 . Efficiency slightly decreased, primarily due to knocking at high engine loads and speeds during H 2 operation. The reduced torque and power were mainly attributed to the turbocharger being undersized for H 2 , given its low density and the lean mixture combustion strategy used. Upgrading the turbocharger or implementing a two-stage compressor could restore or even improve torque and power levels compared to CNG. Heat transfer losses in the H 2 engine were lower than with CNG, due to the lower in-cylinder temperature resulting from the lean mixture strategy, which also contributed to a significant reduction in nitrogen oxides (NO x ) emissions, approximately 2.5 times lower than those with CNG. Despite a notable exhaust energy loss during H 2 operation, caused by delayed combustion due to knocking, the lower NO x emissions and absence of carbon emissions are crucial for reducing pollution. During vehicle cycles, selecting an optimal gear-shift strategy is critical to mitigating the performance gap resulting from reduced torque and power with H 2 fueling. • Direct and port fuel injection are compared in a HD SI engine fueled by H 2 and CNG. • High injection flow rates are essential due to hydrogen’s low density. • Hydrogen fueling eliminates carbon emissions and significantly reduces NO x emissions. • Cylinder filling must be improved with better compressors or a two-stage system. • The autoignition of H 2 affects combustion phasing with an increase of exhaust losses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119425
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of CNG engine conversion to hydrogen fuel for stationary and transient operations

Ricardo Novella, Josep Gómez-Soriano, Armando Maiello, Carlo Beatrice
7 citations
Energy Conversion and Management
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
1.53
article

Evaluation of CNG engine conversion to hydrogen fuel for stationary and transient operations

Ricardo Novella, Josep Gómez-Soriano, Armando Maiello, Carlo Beatrice
article en
7 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the use of hydrogen (H 2 ) as a substitute for compressed natural gas (CNG) in a heavy-duty (HD) six-cylinder engine, focusing on both port fuel injection (PFI) and direct injection (DI) systems. Numerical modeling in a 0D/1D environment was employed, simulating engine operation under stationary conditions and during the worldwide harmonized transient cycle (WHTC) and worldwide harmonized vehicle cycle (WHVC) homologation cycles. Results indicated a reduction in torque (7% for direct injection and 21.5% for port fuel injection) and power (32% for direct injection and 35.5% for port fuel injection) when switching from CNG to H 2 . Efficiency slightly decreased, primarily due to knocking at high engine loads and speeds during H 2 operation. The reduced torque and power were mainly attributed to the turbocharger being undersized for H 2 , given its low density and the lean mixture combustion strategy used. Upgrading the turbocharger or implementing a two-stage compressor could restore or even improve torque and power levels compared to CNG. Heat transfer losses in the H 2 engine were lower than with CNG, due to the lower in-cylinder temperature resulting from the lean mixture strategy, which also contributed to a significant reduction in nitrogen oxides (NO x ) emissions, approximately 2.5 times lower than those with CNG. Despite a notable exhaust energy loss during H 2 operation, caused by delayed combustion due to knocking, the lower NO x emissions and absence of carbon emissions are crucial for reducing pollution. During vehicle cycles, selecting an optimal gear-shift strategy is critical to mitigating the performance gap resulting from reduced torque and power with H 2 fueling. • Direct and port fuel injection are compared in a HD SI engine fueled by H 2 and CNG. • High injection flow rates are essential due to hydrogen’s low density. • Hydrogen fueling eliminates carbon emissions and significantly reduces NO x emissions. • Cylinder filling must be improved with better compressors or a two-stage system. • The autoignition of H 2 affects combustion phasing with an increase of exhaust losses.

Energy Conversion and ManagementVol. 326
Marconi University (IT), Laboratori Guglielmo Marconi (Italy) (IT), Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
1.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.