Rocksitter Flies (Lauxaniidae: <i>Cestrotus</i>) are Key‐Pollinators of <scp><i>Ceropegia pulchellior</i></scp>—A Threatened and Localised South African Endemic With Foetid‐Scented Flowers

ABSTRACT Short‐tongued saprophilous flies are a diverse but under‐appreciated group of pollinators, which are particularly important for flowers in the subtribe Stapeliinae (Apocynaceae‐Asclepiadoideae‐Ceropegieae). This clade of plants is characterised by repeated shifts between tubular kettle‐trap and open non‐trap flowers and chemical mimicry (of decomposing substrates or dying insects) to attract specific fly pollinators. The biology of most Stapeliinae, particularly those with non‐trap flowers, remains poorly studied, hampering our understanding of the mechanisms driving diversification in this plant group. We examined the pollination biology and floral traits of Ceropegia pulchellior , a South African endemic with non‐trap flowers confined to Natal Group Sandstone on the Durban escarpment. Observations showed that flowers are visited exclusively by flies which forage on small amounts of nectar in the corona cavities. Flowers were pollinated primarily by lauxaniid flies in the genus Cestrotus , although several muscid fly species also contribute. Pollinator exclusion experiments confirmed that the plants depend on these flies for reproduction. Reproductive success was low (fruit set never exceeding 8% of flowers). Pollen transfer efficiency was relatively high but variable across the flowering period. GC–MS analysis of floral scent revealed that the foetid odour is dominated by aliphatic acids and p ‐cresol with small amounts of indole, supporting the assumption that C. pulchellior mimics decaying substrates to selectively attract detritus‐feeding (saprophagous) flies as pollinators. Analysis of spectral reflectance of flowers indicates that flower colours, when viewed by the fly pollinators, are not chromatically distinct from the habitat background, suggesting that flowers rely on olfactory rather than visual signals to attract pollinators. This study contributes to the growing awareness of the complexity of pollination systems in the Stapeliinae, in terms of the wide diversity of fly taxa involved, the intricate pollen transfer mechanisms, and the unusual floral scent chemistry associated with mimicry of oviposition substrates and food sources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Entomology
Published
2024-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.13392
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rocksitter Flies (Lauxaniidae: Cestrotus) are Key‐Pollinators of Ceropegia pulchellior—A Threatened and Localised South African Endemic With Foetid‐Scented Flowers

Stephen D. Gaimari, Steven D. Johnson, Andrew E. Whittington, Annemarie Heiduk et al.
Journal of Applied Entomology
Plant and animal studies
article

Rocksitter Flies (Lauxaniidae: Cestrotus) are Key‐Pollinators of Ceropegia pulchellior—A Threatened and Localised South African Endemic With Foetid‐Scented Flowers

Stephen D. Gaimari, Steven D. Johnson, Andrew E. Whittington, Annemarie Heiduk, Adam Shuttleworth
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Short‐tongued saprophilous flies are a diverse but under‐appreciated group of pollinators, which are particularly important for flowers in the subtribe Stapeliinae (Apocynaceae‐Asclepiadoideae‐Ceropegieae). This clade of plants is characterised by repeated shifts between tubular kettle‐trap and open non‐trap flowers and chemical mimicry (of decomposing substrates or dying insects) to attract specific fly pollinators. The biology of most Stapeliinae, particularly those with non‐trap flowers, remains poorly studied, hampering our understanding of the mechanisms driving diversification in this plant group. We examined the pollination biology and floral traits of Ceropegia pulchellior , a South African endemic with non‐trap flowers confined to Natal Group Sandstone on the Durban escarpment. Observations showed that flowers are visited exclusively by flies which forage on small amounts of nectar in the corona cavities. Flowers were pollinated primarily by lauxaniid flies in the genus Cestrotus , although several muscid fly species also contribute. Pollinator exclusion experiments confirmed that the plants depend on these flies for reproduction. Reproductive success was low (fruit set never exceeding 8% of flowers). Pollen transfer efficiency was relatively high but variable across the flowering period. GC–MS analysis of floral scent revealed that the foetid odour is dominated by aliphatic acids and p ‐cresol with small amounts of indole, supporting the assumption that C. pulchellior mimics decaying substrates to selectively attract detritus‐feeding (saprophagous) flies as pollinators. Analysis of spectral reflectance of flowers indicates that flower colours, when viewed by the fly pollinators, are not chromatically distinct from the habitat background, suggesting that flowers rely on olfactory rather than visual signals to attract pollinators. This study contributes to the growing awareness of the complexity of pollination systems in the Stapeliinae, in terms of the wide diversity of fly taxa involved, the intricate pollen transfer mechanisms, and the unusual floral scent chemistry associated with mimicry of oviposition substrates and food sources.

Journal of Applied EntomologyVol. 149(6)
California Department of Food and Agriculture (US), University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.