Performance Comparison of Transparent and Non-Transparent Wineglass-Shaped Antenna at 28 GHz

This paper discussed the performance of a wineglass-shaped antenna fabricated on transparent (indium tin oxide on glass) and non-transparent (Rogers RT6006) substrates. Simulated and measured results of coefficient reflection, VSWR, and radiation patterns are compared and analyzed. Both antennas are well matched at the designed frequency with good reflection coefficient. The non-transparent antenna minimum coefficient reflection is -35.45 dB, and the transparent antenna reached the value of -19.71 dB. The non-transparent antenna has higher gain and exhibits symmetrical radiation. The study demonstrates the feasibility of both transparent and non-transparent wineglass antennas at 28 GHz, with the non-transparent offering higher gain and better impedance matching from a better conductivity compared to the transparent material used.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ELEKTRIKA- Journal of Electrical Engineering
Published
2024-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11113/elektrika.v23n3.536
Primary Topic
Antenna Design and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Comparison of Transparent and Non-Transparent Wineglass-Shaped Antenna at 28 GHz

Noor Asniza Murad, Teguh Praludi, Yusuf Nur Wijayanto, M. F. M. Yussof et al.
ELEKTRIKA- Journal of Electrical Engineering
Antenna Design and Analysis
article

Performance Comparison of Transparent and Non-Transparent Wineglass-Shaped Antenna at 28 GHz

Noor Asniza Murad, Teguh Praludi, Yusuf Nur Wijayanto, M. F. M. Yussof, Gandi Sugandi, Topik Teguh Estu
article en

Abstract

This paper discussed the performance of a wineglass-shaped antenna fabricated on transparent (indium tin oxide on glass) and non-transparent (Rogers RT6006) substrates. Simulated and measured results of coefficient reflection, VSWR, and radiation patterns are compared and analyzed. Both antennas are well matched at the designed frequency with good reflection coefficient. The non-transparent antenna minimum coefficient reflection is -35.45 dB, and the transparent antenna reached the value of -19.71 dB. The non-transparent antenna has higher gain and exhibits symmetrical radiation. The study demonstrates the feasibility of both transparent and non-transparent wineglass antennas at 28 GHz, with the non-transparent offering higher gain and better impedance matching from a better conductivity compared to the transparent material used.

ELEKTRIKA- Journal of Electrical EngineeringVol. 23(3)
National Nuclear Energy Agency of Indonesia (ID), University of Technology Malaysia (MY)
Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Antenna Design and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Performance Comparison of Transparent and Non-Transparent Wineglass-Shaped Antenna at 28 GHz — Noor Asniza Murad, Teguh Praludi, et al. · ELEKTRIKA- Journal of Electrical Engineering (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS