Who misses the bare necessities? Material deprivation as an indicator for egotropic economic voting

There is strong empirical support for the theory of sociotropic economic voting, stating that voters decide which party to vote for based on their perception of the country’s economic situation. There is less evidence, however, for the occurrence of egotropic economic voting, where electoral preferences are determined by individual economic circumstances. We argue that this lack of support is partly caused by the way in which personal economic evaluations have been measured thus far. A subjective question on financial satisfaction is not necessarily related to real life circumstances, and therefore we rely on less biased indicators of material deprivation (MD). Using the 7th wave of the World Values Survey, we find that subjective perceptions of one’s financial situation are only weakly related to incumbent voting. Our new measure of MD, on the contrary, is significantly related to electoral support for the incumbent and therefore offers a better operationalization of egotropic economic voting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Political Science Review
Published
2024-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01925121241305353
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who misses the bare necessities? Material deprivation as an indicator for egotropic economic voting

Marc Hooghe, Dieter Stiers, Chloé De Grauwe
1 citations
International Political Science Review
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
2.23
article

Who misses the bare necessities? Material deprivation as an indicator for egotropic economic voting

Marc Hooghe, Dieter Stiers, Chloé De Grauwe
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There is strong empirical support for the theory of sociotropic economic voting, stating that voters decide which party to vote for based on their perception of the country’s economic situation. There is less evidence, however, for the occurrence of egotropic economic voting, where electoral preferences are determined by individual economic circumstances. We argue that this lack of support is partly caused by the way in which personal economic evaluations have been measured thus far. A subjective question on financial satisfaction is not necessarily related to real life circumstances, and therefore we rely on less biased indicators of material deprivation (MD). Using the 7th wave of the World Values Survey, we find that subjective perceptions of one’s financial situation are only weakly related to incumbent voting. Our new measure of MD, on the contrary, is significantly related to electoral support for the incumbent and therefore offers a better operationalization of egotropic economic voting.

International Political Science ReviewVol. 47(1)
KU Leuven (BE)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.