Commentary: A framework for assessment of adverse events in psychedelic research

Recent discussions about the methodological rigor of psychedelic clinical trials have focused on potential underreporting or misreporting of adverse events (AEs), with many calling for their systematic assessment to help mitigate these issues. In their recent paper, Palitsky et al. offer a comprehensive framework for the assessment of AEs in psychedelic-assisted therapies, with consideration of the spiritual, existential, religious, and theological impacts that psychedelics can have. In this commentary, we respond to Palitsky et al.'s proposal, discussing the framework, its feasibility, and various assessment methods. We emphasize the need to ensure that AE assessment in psychedelic clinical trials is held to the same rigor and standard as research in other areas, in addition to maintaining and improving transparency and accessibility in AE reporting.