Regulator insight on the establishment of social-based healthcare institutions in Malaysia

Social innovation is gaining significant recognition in research and policy domains, including within the healthcare sector. Institutions based on trade and business principles have accumulated social capital to pursue social objectives. However, the sustainability of these social-based healthcare institutions remains uncertain. Regulatory insights are essential for the development and maintenance of these institutions in the future. This qualitative study aims to explore and understand the perspective of the Division of Medical Practice and Private Services (CKAPS) on the establishment and sustainability of social-based healthcare institutions. Consequently, primary data were collected through interviews with officers at the CKPAS, while secondary data were obtained from documentary analysis of Act 586 and related documents. The transcripts were analyzed inductively using NVivo software, with codes and themes developed based on a preestablished conceptual framework. The findings reveal no definitional distinction between social-based and profit-based private healthcare providers. Both types of institutions are governed by Act 586 and its subsidiary regulations regarding establishment, maintenance, and licensing. Practically, social-based healthcare can be identified through 1) self-declaration, 2) documents such as tax exemption letter from LHDN or the National Audit Department, and 3) information from the public. To ensure sustainability, social-based healthcare institutions must adhere to the principles outlined in Act 586, which emphasize comprehensive planning and robust proposals. Healthcare quality is the top priority and should not be forgotten to reduce the cost of healthcare in an attempt to serve the poor. Thus, these institutions need to be financially, socially, and environmentally sustainable, managed by qualified and experienced leadership teams. The key critical contribution of this study is that it presents new evidence regarding the impacts of government policies towards the establishment and sustainability of social-based healthcare institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Multidisciplinary Science Journal
Published
2024-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025265
Primary Topic
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulator insight on the establishment of social-based healthcare institutions in Malaysia

Nur Atika Atan, Fuadah Joharı, Zurina Kefeli, Nurul Ibtisyami Yasin et al.
Multidisciplinary Science Journal
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
article

Regulator insight on the establishment of social-based healthcare institutions in Malaysia

Nur Atika Atan, Fuadah Joharı, Zurina Kefeli, Nurul Ibtisyami Yasin, Rose Ruziana Samad, Ahmad Syahid Mohd Fadzil
article en

Abstract

Social innovation is gaining significant recognition in research and policy domains, including within the healthcare sector. Institutions based on trade and business principles have accumulated social capital to pursue social objectives. However, the sustainability of these social-based healthcare institutions remains uncertain. Regulatory insights are essential for the development and maintenance of these institutions in the future. This qualitative study aims to explore and understand the perspective of the Division of Medical Practice and Private Services (CKAPS) on the establishment and sustainability of social-based healthcare institutions. Consequently, primary data were collected through interviews with officers at the CKPAS, while secondary data were obtained from documentary analysis of Act 586 and related documents. The transcripts were analyzed inductively using NVivo software, with codes and themes developed based on a preestablished conceptual framework. The findings reveal no definitional distinction between social-based and profit-based private healthcare providers. Both types of institutions are governed by Act 586 and its subsidiary regulations regarding establishment, maintenance, and licensing. Practically, social-based healthcare can be identified through 1) self-declaration, 2) documents such as tax exemption letter from LHDN or the National Audit Department, and 3) information from the public. To ensure sustainability, social-based healthcare institutions must adhere to the principles outlined in Act 586, which emphasize comprehensive planning and robust proposals. Healthcare quality is the top priority and should not be forgotten to reduce the cost of healthcare in an attempt to serve the poor. Thus, these institutions need to be financially, socially, and environmentally sustainable, managed by qualified and experienced leadership teams. The key critical contribution of this study is that it presents new evidence regarding the impacts of government policies towards the establishment and sustainability of social-based healthcare institutions.

Multidisciplinary Science JournalVol. 7(6)
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (MY), Technical University of Malaysia Malacca (MY), Nilai University (MY)
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.