Multi-criteria analysis for energy planning in Ecuador: Enhancing decision-making through comprehensive evaluation

The growing demand for electricity and the need to mitigate climate change drive the development of renewable energy projects. In some cases, their implementation has led to socio-environmental conflicts. The planning of power plants generally prioritizes technical and economic criteria, while socio-environmental aspects and the involvement of local stakeholders remain limited. In Ecuador, the construction of hydroelectric plants has increased generation capacity but has also triggered conflicts in nearby areas. This study aimed to integrate diverse criteria and stakeholders into Ecuador’s energy infrastructure planning process. A multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) was conducted on a portfolio of 101 renewable energy projects planned for the coming years, including 91 hydroelectric, 2 solar photovoltaic, 3 wind, and 5 geothermal projects, with a total capacity of 12,532.45 MW. Nine criteria were analyzed and organized into social, environmental, and technical categories. Social criteria included project perception, job creation, and relocation; environmental criteria covered deforestation, risks to wildlife, and proximity to natural reserves; and technical criteria included plant size, accessibility, and distance to transmission lines. The analysis involved four stakeholder groups—academia, public sector, private sector, and civil society—who expressed their preferences across criteria to ultimately rank the projects from best to worst using the PROMETHEE method. Results showed that energy project planning prioritizes social and environmental criteria over technical ones. Thus, 55 projects (49 hydroelectric, one geothermal, two solar photovoltaic, and three wind) were selected for future construction. In comparison, 42 hydroelectric and four geothermal projects were excluded due to potential impacts on wildlife and forests near protected areas. The methodology suggests that decision-makers should incorporate a multidisciplinary, inclusive, and participatory approach when planning energy infrastructure to ensure it is environmentally sustainable and socially acceptable. • Solar and wind projects meet the expectations of diverse stakeholder groups effectively. • Integrating socio-environmental criteria transforms Ecuador’s energy planning. • Learning from conflicts and diverse knowledge reduces opposition in Ecuador’s energy planning. • Communities near hydro plants stress sustainable water use for balanced development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Renewable Energy
Published
2024-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.122278
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-criteria analysis for energy planning in Ecuador: Enhancing decision-making through comprehensive evaluation

Thomas Hamacher, Ricardo Cajo, Janeth Carolina Godoy, Laura Mesa Estrada
13 citations
Renewable Energy
Urban Planning and Valuation
9.23
article

Multi-criteria analysis for energy planning in Ecuador: Enhancing decision-making through comprehensive evaluation

Thomas Hamacher, Ricardo Cajo, Janeth Carolina Godoy, Laura Mesa Estrada
article en
13 citations

Abstract

The growing demand for electricity and the need to mitigate climate change drive the development of renewable energy projects. In some cases, their implementation has led to socio-environmental conflicts. The planning of power plants generally prioritizes technical and economic criteria, while socio-environmental aspects and the involvement of local stakeholders remain limited. In Ecuador, the construction of hydroelectric plants has increased generation capacity but has also triggered conflicts in nearby areas. This study aimed to integrate diverse criteria and stakeholders into Ecuador’s energy infrastructure planning process. A multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) was conducted on a portfolio of 101 renewable energy projects planned for the coming years, including 91 hydroelectric, 2 solar photovoltaic, 3 wind, and 5 geothermal projects, with a total capacity of 12,532.45 MW. Nine criteria were analyzed and organized into social, environmental, and technical categories. Social criteria included project perception, job creation, and relocation; environmental criteria covered deforestation, risks to wildlife, and proximity to natural reserves; and technical criteria included plant size, accessibility, and distance to transmission lines. The analysis involved four stakeholder groups—academia, public sector, private sector, and civil society—who expressed their preferences across criteria to ultimately rank the projects from best to worst using the PROMETHEE method. Results showed that energy project planning prioritizes social and environmental criteria over technical ones. Thus, 55 projects (49 hydroelectric, one geothermal, two solar photovoltaic, and three wind) were selected for future construction. In comparison, 42 hydroelectric and four geothermal projects were excluded due to potential impacts on wildlife and forests near protected areas. The methodology suggests that decision-makers should incorporate a multidisciplinary, inclusive, and participatory approach when planning energy infrastructure to ensure it is environmentally sustainable and socially acceptable. • Solar and wind projects meet the expectations of diverse stakeholder groups effectively. • Integrating socio-environmental criteria transforms Ecuador’s energy planning. • Learning from conflicts and diverse knowledge reduces opposition in Ecuador’s energy planning. • Communities near hydro plants stress sustainable water use for balanced development.

Renewable EnergyVol. 241
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral (EC), Renewable Energy Systems (United States) (US), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Urban Planning and Valuation
9.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.